Bioavailability of moclobemide from two formulation tablets in healthy humans

A ,,sine qua non" requirement for a generic formulation to be admitted for a medical use is to provide bioavailability studies in healthy subjects. Therefore, those studies were performed for 150 mg moclobemide tablets (Jelfa, Poland) versus 150 mg Aurorix (Hoffmann la Roche) reference tablets. An open-label, two-phase crossover study was conducted with 10 healthy subjects. Pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC, ke, t_1/2, C_max, t_max, t_lag, V/f, Cl/f) obtained at the same time for moclobemide were supposed to be confronted with the literature data available for healthy volunteers. The plasma moclobemide levels as a function of time were calculated according to either an open one-compartment body model with lag time of absorption or non-compartmental method for calculation of bioavailability using Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 software. For those reasons a suitable HPLC method was worked out. Carbamazepine was proposed as an internal standard and ammonia as well as Na₂HPO₄ as alkalizing agents for the mobile phase and the liquid-liquid extraction of moclobemide from human blood plasma, respectively. Basic pharmacokinetic parameters of moclobemide obtained in the paper are essentially equal to the literature data for the healthy subjects. However, bioavailability parameters (AUC_0→t, AUC_0→∞, C_max, t_max) were greater for moclobemide tablets (Jelfa) if compared to Aurorix tablets (Roche) by more than 20 %. Furthermore, the extent of bioavailability (110.6 %) for the generic moclobemide tablets if compared to Aurorix tablets is not significantly different. It seems to us that the number of subjects should be increased from 10 to 24 to help to clarify that inconsequence.