Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Assessing Social Dominance in Mouse Models Using the Tube Test
Published on: June 6, 2025
Effects of dominance and prestige based social status on competition for attentional resources
Ashton Roberts1, Romina Palermo2,3, Troy A W Visser2
1School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia. ashton.roberts@research.uwa.edu.au.
Abstract:
Social status can be attained through either dominance (coercion and intimidation) or prestige (skill and respect). Individuals high in either of these status pathways are known to more readily attract gaze and covert spatial attention compared to their low-status counterparts. However it is not known if social status biases allocation of attentional resources to competing stimuli. To address this issue, we used an attentional blink paradigm to explore non-spatial attentional biases in response to face stimuli varying in dominance and prestige. Results from a series of studies consistently indicated that participants were biased towards allocating attention to low- relative to high- dominance faces. We also observed no effects of manipulating prestige on attentional bias. We attribute our results to the workings of comparatively early processing stages, separate from those mediating spatial attention shifts, which are tuned to physical features associated with low dominance. These findings challenge our current understanding of the impact of social status on attentional competition.
Related Concept Videos
Competition
Social Traps
Incomplete Dominance
Social Scripts
Social Proof
Social Exchange Theory

