Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

RNA Interference in Aquatic Beetles as a Powerful Tool for Manipulating Gene Expression at Specific Developmental Time Points
Published on: May 29, 2020
Time for Radical Changes in Brain Stem Nomenclature-Applying the Lessons From Developmental Gene Patterns
Charles Watson1,2, Caitlin Bartholomaeus1, Luis Puelles3
1School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Abstract:
The traditional subdivision of the brain stem into midbrain, pons, and medulla oblongata is based purely on the external appearance of the human brain stem. There is an urgent need to update the names of brain stem structures to be consistent with the discovery of rhomobomeric segmentation based on gene expression. The most important mistakes are the belief that the pons occupies the upper half of the hindbrain, the failure to recognize the isthmus as the first segment of the hindbrain, and the mistaken inclusion of diencephalic structures in the midbrain. The new nomenclature will apply to all mammals. This essay recommends a new brain stem nomenclature based on developmental gene expression, progeny analysis, and fate mapping. In addition, we have made comment on the names given to a number of internal brain stem structures and have offered alternatives where necessary.
Related Concept Videos
Ionic Compounds: Formulas and Nomenclature
Molecular Compounds: Formulas and Nomenclature
Coordination Compounds and Nomenclature
Drug Nomenclature
Nomenclature of Alkenes
As per the IUPAC rules, the longest carbon chain containing the maximum number of double bonds is identified as the parent chain and is numbered such that the doubly bonded carbon atoms receive the lowest possible numbers. The location of the double bond is indicated by the number of its first carbon atom. In branched...
Fixed Action Patterns

