Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Distinguishing between active and passive euthanasia.

B Gert, C M Culver

    Clinics in Geriatric Medicine
    |February 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The desirability of a Periscopic quality in correcting lenses.

    Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society·2014
    Same author

    Estimating risks of de novo kidney diseases after living kidney donation.

    American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2014
    Same author

    Ask the ethicist: would you tell the patients?

    Medical ethics (Burlington, Mass.)·2005
    Same author

    What information should physicians be required to know?

    Newsletter on philosophy and medicine·2004
    Same author

    Advance directives.

    Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2003
    Same author

    A technique for presenting risk and outcome data to potential living renal transplant donors.

    Transplantation·2001
    Same journal

    Cardiovascular Prevention in Older Adults: From Estimation to Treatment.

    Clinics in geriatric medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Preventive Cardiology for the Clinically Complex Older Adult.

    Clinics in geriatric medicine·2026
    Same journal

    A Preventive Neurology Perspective on Promoting Brain Health and Preventing Cardiovascular Disease.

    Clinics in geriatric medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Secondary Prevention in Older Adults: Putting It All Together.

    Clinics in geriatric medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Primary Prevention in Older Adults: Putting It All Together.

    Clinics in geriatric medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Managing Bleeding Risk in Older Adults: Antithrombotics and Anticoagulants.

    Clinics in geriatric medicine·2026
    See all related articles

    Distinguishing active versus passive euthanasia is morally significant when based on a patient's rational refusal of treatment. This approach respects patient autonomy and clarifies physician duties in end-of-life care.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Bioethics
    • Philosophy of Medicine

    Background:

    • Traditional distinctions in euthanasia (active vs. passive, act vs. omission) lack clear moral weight.
    • Existing frameworks for end-of-life decisions can be confusing for both patients and physicians.
    • Patient autonomy in medical decision-making is a cornerstone of modern healthcare ethics.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To establish a morally significant distinction between active and passive euthanasia.
    • To redefine passive euthanasia based on the physician-patient relationship and patient refusal.
    • To provide a clearer ethical foundation for end-of-life care decisions.

    Main Methods:

    • Defining passive euthanasia as physician adherence to a patient's rational, valid refusal of life-sustaining treatment.
    Keywords:
    Death and Euthanasia

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzing the moral implications of discontinuing versus withholding treatment.
  • Examining the force of competent patient refusals when they become incompetent.

    • Main Results:

    • A patient's rational refusal of treatment provides a morally significant basis for distinguishing euthanasia types.
    • There is no moral difference between initiating and ceasing life support if based on refusal.
    • Withholding or withdrawing nutrition and hydration can be morally required if rationally refused by the patient.

    Conclusions:

    • Basing the active/passive euthanasia distinction on rational refusal strengthens its moral significance.
    • This framework enhances patient control over their end-of-life choices.
    • It simplifies ethical decision-making for physicians, reducing reliance on ambiguous distinctions.