Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Optical Coherence Tomography: Imaging Mouse Retinal Ganglion Cells In Vivo
Published on: September 22, 2017
Optical Coherence Tomography Segmentation Errors of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Persist Over Time
Nisha Nagarkatti-Gude1, Stuart K Gardiner, Brad Fortune
1Legacy Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR.
Automated segmentation errors in retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements in glaucoma patients are persistent. Automated segmentation is more repeatable and potentially more sensitive for monitoring glaucoma progression than manual refinement.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Imaging
- Glaucoma Research
Background:
- Automated segmentation of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) in optical coherence tomography (OCT) can have errors, particularly in glaucoma suspects or those with mild glaucoma.
- These segmentation errors may impact the reliability of RNFL thickness measurements over time.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if optical coherence tomography (OCT) segmentation errors in RNFL thickness measurements persist longitudinally.
- To assess the repeatability and sensitivity of automated versus manually refined RNFL segmentation for glaucoma progression monitoring.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study involving 406 eyes from 213 participants using spectral domain OCT (Spectralis).
- RNFL thickness was measured in a 6-degree peripapillary circle, comparing automated segmentation results with those after manual refinement.
- Bland-Altman plots and linear regression analyzed the magnitude, location, and repeatability of segmentation errors at baseline and follow-up points up to 4 years.
Main Results:
- Segmentation errors at baseline showed a high correlation (r>0.5) with errors at follow-up time points.
- Automated segmentation exhibited smaller standard deviation of residuals (1.56 μm vs. 1.80 μm) compared to manual refinement.
- Automated segmentation demonstrated a higher ability to monitor progression, indicated by longitudinal signal-to-noise ratio analysis.
Conclusions:
- Errors in automated RNFL segmentation are relatively stable and tend to persist longitudinally in both direction and magnitude.
- Automated segmentation, without manual refinement, offers greater repeatability and may be more sensitive for detecting glaucomatous progression.
- Future advancements in segmentation algorithms can leverage these findings to enhance automated segmentation accuracy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Differential Sensitivity of Nerve Fibers
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Fundamental Attribution Error
Random Error
Margin of Error
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

