Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton
Published on: May 7, 2016
Functional stability analyses of maxillofacial skeleton bearing cleft deformities
Xiangyou Luo1,2, Hanyao Huang1,2, Xing Yin1,3
1State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Centre for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, 14 Ren Min Nan Road, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Craniofacial deformities, like orofacial clefts, cause maxillary instability. Finite element modeling revealed specific instability patterns linked to cleft type, impacting dental arch form and suggesting new growth study approaches.
Area of Science:
- Craniofacial biology
- Biomechanical engineering
- Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery
Background:
- Congenital craniofacial deformities, particularly orofacial clefts, are associated with bony defects impacting facial structure and stability.
- Maxillary instability and secondary deformities are common in patients with orofacial clefts, but the precise relationship with bony defects remains unclear.
- Understanding the biomechanics of maxillary instability is crucial for improving treatment outcomes in patients with craniofacial deformities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the detailed relationship between cleft-related bony defects and maxillary instability under occlusal loading using finite element modeling.
- To explore the pattern and extent of maxillary instability associated with different types of orofacial clefts.
- To correlate observed instability patterns with secondary maxillary deformities in patients with craniofacial deformities.
Main Methods:
- Generation of craniofacial models from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data for normal and cleft individuals.
- Application of finite element analysis (FEA) to simulate occlusal loading and assess craniofacial deformation.
- Comparison of biomechanical responses, including asymmetry, arch contraction, and protrusion, across different cleft types (palatal, alveolar, unilateral, bilateral).
Main Results:
- All cleft models exhibited greater asymmetry in deformation during mastication compared to normal models.
- Models with palatal clefts showed increased asymmetry, dental arch contraction, and reduced maxillary protrusion compared to alveolar clefts.
- Unilateral clefts resulted in differential protrusion and elevation of the alveolus, while bilateral clefts presented with severely contracted arches and premaxillary displacement.
Conclusions:
- Cleft type dictates specific patterns of maxillary instability, correlating with observed dentoalveolar morphological features.
- The study elucidates the biomechanical link between bony defects and maxillary instability in orofacial clefts.
- Findings provide a foundation for studying abnormal maxillary and dental arch growth in patients with craniofacial deformities.
Related Concept Videos
Carbon Skeletons
Plastic Deformations
Plastic Deformations
Skeleton and Calcium Homeostasis
Overview of the Axial Skeleton
The axial skeleton of the...
Changes in the Appendicular Skeleton with Age
Initially, the limb buds consist of a core of mesenchyme covered by a layer of ectoderm. The ectoderm at the end of the limb bud thickens to form a narrow crest called the apical ectodermal ridge. This ridge stimulates the underlying...

