Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Nutritional risk screening-a cross-sectional study in a tertiary pediatric hospital
J Tuokkola1,2, J Hilpi3, K-L Kolho4
1Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 281, FI-00029 HUH, Helsinki, Finland. jetta.tuokkola@iki.fi.
Insights
Pediatric malnutrition screening is crucial. The STRONGkids tool demonstrated the highest accuracy in identifying acute malnutrition among hospitalized children, improving early dietary interventions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Clinical Assessment
- Hospital Medicine
Background:
- Hospitalized patients require malnutrition risk screening.
- A universal screening method for pediatric patients is lacking.
- Early identification of malnutrition is vital for effective treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of three distinct malnutrition risk screening tools in pediatric inpatients.
- To identify the most accurate tool for detecting acute malnutrition in children.
- To inform the selection of a standardized malnutrition screening protocol.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study was conducted at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland.
- Three malnutrition risk screening tools (PYMS, STAMP, STRONGkids) were applied to inpatients aged 1 month to 17 years.
- Data were collected over five consecutive weekdays.
Main Results:
- A 67% participation rate was achieved among eligible pediatric inpatients.
- 6.2% of children were identified as acutely malnourished and correctly categorized by the tools.
- The STRONGkids tool exhibited the highest specificity (100%) and positive predictive value (36%), with a trend towards longer hospital stays for malnourished children (p=0.051).
Conclusions:
- The STRONGkids tool was identified as the most accurate for detecting acute malnutrition in pediatric inpatients.
- STRONGkids was adopted as the standard malnutrition screening method at the hospital.
- Routine screening is essential for identifying at-risk children and ensuring timely dietary interventions.
Background:
All hospitalized patients should be screened for malnutrition risk. No universal method exists for pediatric patients.
Methods:
We performed a cross-sectional study comparing three published malnutrition risk screening tools (PYMS, STAMP, and STRONGkids), applying them to each inpatient aged 1 month to 17 years over a period of five consecutive weekdays in Helsinki University Hospital, Finland.
Results:
Of the eligible patients, 67% (n = 69) participated. We found that 6.2% of the children were acutely malnourished and accurately categorized by the three tools. STRONGkids showed the highest specificity (100%) and positive predictive value (36%). Acute malnutrition seemed to be associated with longer hospital stay (p = 0.051).
Conclusion:
STRONGkids was the most accurate screening tool for detecting acute malnutrition and was therefore chosen as the screening method in our hospital. Routine screening for the risk of malnutrition in pediatric inpatients is important in detecting at-risk children who would otherwise be left without dietary intervention.
More Related Videos
08:42Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression
Published on: May 19, 2015
06:43Optical Cross-Sectional Muscle Area Determination of Drosophila Melanogaster Adult Indirect Flight Muscles
Published on: March 31, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
Profile Leveling and Cross Sections
Hospitals-I
Spinal Cord: Cross-sectional Anatomy
Gray Matter and its Components
Central to the gray matter is...
The Roles of Bacteria and Fungi in Plant Nutrition