Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
Computed Tomography-Based Indexed Aortic Annulus Size to Predict Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.
Stuart J Head1, Michael J Reardon2, G Michael Deeb3
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (S.J.H., A.P.K) at Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) shows better hemodynamic performance and lower rates of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) than surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) across all annulus sizes. These findings are crucial for guiding TAVR vs. SAVR procedural recommendations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Prosthetic Valve Technology
Background:
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) generally offers superior hemodynamic performance compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), particularly in patients with small native annulus sizes.
- The consistency of these benefits across varying degrees of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) propensity, considering patient annulus and body size, remains an area of active investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes of TAVR versus SAVR in intermediate-risk patients stratified by indexed aortic annulus size.
- To evaluate the incidence and predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) in both TAVR and SAVR groups.
Main Methods:
- The study analyzed data from the SURTAVI trial, comparing self-expandable TAVR valves with SAVR in intermediate-risk patients.
- Indexed aortic annulus size was calculated using multidetector computed tomography and categorized into small, medium, and large groups.
- Hemodynamics, PPM rates, and clinical outcomes were assessed up to 1-year post-procedure.
Main Results:
- TAVR prostheses were larger with increasing indexed annulus size, unlike SAVR.
- Patients receiving TAVR demonstrated significantly better indexed effective orifice area and lower mean gradients across all annulus size groups.
- Rates of PPM were substantially lower with TAVR compared to SAVR in all groups and decreased with larger indexed annulus sizes for both procedures.
Conclusions:
- TAVR consistently provides superior hemodynamic performance and lower PPM rates than SAVR, irrespective of the patient's propensity for PPM.
- Indexed annulus size is an independent predictor of PPM for both TAVR and SAVR.
- Clinical outcomes were similar, except for a higher reintervention rate with TAVR in the large annulus group, suggesting careful consideration for procedural and valve selection.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mismatch Repair
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

