Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

13.8K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
13.8K
The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

31.5K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
31.5K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

51.0K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
51.0K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.7K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.7K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures03:34

Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures

81.1K
All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.
81.1K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

10.4K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
10.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

AMR-GNN: a multi-representation graph neural network framework to enable genomic antimicrobial resistance prediction.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Complex pathways to ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance in clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates: a genomic epidemiology study.

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2025
Same author

Model Selection from Multiple Model Families in Species Distribution Modeling Using Minimum Message Length.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Predicting <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> drug resistance using artificial intelligence and clinical MALDI-TOF mass spectra.

mSystems·2024
Same author

Minimum Message Length in Hybrid ARMA and LSTM Model Forecasting.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Combining images and anatomical knowledge to improve automated vein segmentation in MRI.

NeuroImage·2017
Same journal

Are language models models?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Large language models illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of the creative aspect of language use (CALU), long regarded as a mystery.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

LLMs as a platform for studying constraint interaction: Motivation and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond the data gap: Children create languages, violate their input statistics, and exhibit critical periods.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Not-so-strange love: Language models and generative linguistic theories are more compatible than they appear.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Rich data drive generalization: Lessons from machine learning for linguistics and cognitive science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Novel 3D/VR Interactive Environment for MD Simulations, Visualization and Analysis
11:29

Novel 3D/VR Interactive Environment for MD Simulations, Visualization and Analysis

Published on: December 18, 2014

12.3K

Simulating exploration versus exploitation in agent foraging under different environment uncertainties.

Nader Chmait1, David L Dowe1, David G Green1

  • 1Faculty of Information Technology,Monash University,Melbourne,VIC 3800,Australia.nader.chmait@monash.edudavid.dowe@monash.edudavid.green@monash.eduyuanfang.li@monash.eduhttp://users.monash.edu.au/~naderc/http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~dld/David.Dowe.publications.htmlhttps://research.monash.edu/en/persons/david-greenhttp://users.monash.edu.au/~yli/.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|April 4, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Artificial agents prioritize food seeking when environmental uncertainty is high. In less uncertain, biased environments, agents benefit more from exploiting known food sources.

More Related Videos

Simulation of Early Earth Hydrothermal Chimneys in a Thermal Gradient Environment
06:29

Simulation of Early Earth Hydrothermal Chimneys in a Thermal Gradient Environment

Published on: February 27, 2021

4.0K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Novel 3D/VR Interactive Environment for MD Simulations, Visualization and Analysis
11:29

Novel 3D/VR Interactive Environment for MD Simulations, Visualization and Analysis

Published on: December 18, 2014

12.3K
Simulation of Early Earth Hydrothermal Chimneys in a Thermal Gradient Environment
06:29

Simulation of Early Earth Hydrothermal Chimneys in a Thermal Gradient Environment

Published on: February 27, 2021

4.0K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Behavioral economics
  • Computational neuroscience

Background:

  • Artificial agents often face a trade-off between exploring for new resources and exploiting existing ones.
  • Understanding decision-making strategies in uncertain environments is crucial for agent design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how environmental uncertainty influences the exploration-exploitation balance in artificial agents.
  • To determine the optimal foraging strategy for agents in varying environmental conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated artificial agents foraging for food resources.
  • Manipulation of environmental uncertainty by altering food distribution (uniform random vs. biased).
  • Analysis of agent behavior focusing on exploration (food seeking) and exploitation (consumption) metrics.

Main Results:

  • Increased environmental uncertainty significantly amplified the agents' tendency towards exploration.
  • In uniformly random (high uncertainty) environments, exploration proved beneficial.
  • In biased (low uncertainty) environments, exploitation yielded better performance, with agents performing better overall in these conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Environmental uncertainty is a key factor modulating the exploration-exploitation trade-off in artificial agents.
  • Adaptive foraging strategies are essential for optimizing agent performance across different environmental complexities.
  • Biased environments appear more conducive to agent success due to reduced uncertainty, favoring exploitation.