Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Application of Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography Imaging in a Rat Model of NAFLD/NASH
Published on: April 20, 2021
Does Shear Wave Elastography Score Over Strain Elastography in Breast Masses or Vice Versa?
Veenu Singla1, Aparna Prakash1, Nidhi Prabhakar1
1Department of Radiodiagnosis, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Strain elastography (SE) and shear-wave elastography (SWE) effectively differentiate benign and malignant breast masses. Quantitative SE parameters demonstrate diagnostic performance comparable to quantitative SWE parameters.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Diagnostic Ultrasound
- Breast Imaging
Background:
- Elastography techniques, including strain elastography (SE) and shear-wave elastography (SWE), are increasingly used in breast mass characterization.
- Accurate differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions is crucial for appropriate patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic performance of various strain elastography (SE) and shear-wave elastography (SWE) parameters for differentiating benign from malignant breast masses.
- To determine the optimal cut-off values for these parameters to maximize sensitivity and specificity.
Main Methods:
- B-mode ultrasound (USG), SE, and SWE were performed on 199 breast masses.
- SE parameters included a 5-point visual score and strain ratio (SEstrain ratio).
- SWE parameters included mean and maximum elasticity values (kPa) and shear wave ratio, averaged across two orthogonal planes (SWEmean avg, SWEmax avg, SWEratio avg).
- All elastography parameters were correlated with histopathology results.
Main Results:
- The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) for SEvisual score, SEstrain ratio, SWEmean avg, SWEmax avg, and SWEratio avg were 0.815, 0.814, 0.846, 0.846, and 0.799, respectively.
- Optimal cut-off values were identified: SEstrain ratio (3.91), SWEmean avg (113 kPa), SWEmax avg (123.5 kPa), and SWEratio avg (7.32).
Conclusions:
- Quantitative strain elastography parameters exhibit diagnostic performance comparable to quantitative shear-wave elastography parameters in differentiating breast masses.
- The established cut-off values can aid in the accurate classification of breast lesions using both SE and SWE techniques.
More Related Videos
05:56Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: August 29, 2025
04:51Author Spotlight: Characterizing Environmental Biofilm Mechanics Using Optical Coherence Elastography and its Applications in Wastewater Treatment
Published on: March 1, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Shearing Strain
Elastic Strain Energy for Shearing Stresses
The Wave Nature of Light
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
z Scores and Area Under the Curve