Diagnostic accuracies of screening for atrial fibrillation by cardiac nurses versus radiographers
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Transesophageal Atrial Burst Pacing for Atrial Fibrillation Induction in Rats
Published on: February 14, 2022
Lærke Marius Kvist1, Nicklas Vinter1,2, Grazina Urbonaviciene1,2
1Diagnostic Centre, Regionshospitalet Silkeborg, Silkeborg, Denmark.
Insights
Single-lead ECG by radiographers showed moderate accuracy for atrial fibrillation (AF) detection, while 12-lead ECG by nurses was highly accurate. This suggests 12-lead ECG by nurses is a viable method for diagnosing AF.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Diagnostic Accuracy
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia requiring accurate diagnosis.
- Screening for AF in older populations can improve health outcomes.
- Evaluating the diagnostic performance of different ECG leads and healthcare professionals is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic accuracy of single-lead ECG interpreted by radiographers versus 12-lead ECG interpreted by cardiac nurses for detecting atrial fibrillation (AF).
Main Methods:
- A population-based, cross-sectional study of 1338 men aged 65-74 years was conducted.
- Participants underwent single-lead ECG during CT scans (assessed by radiographers) and 12-lead ECG (assessed by cardiac nurses).
- Diagnostic accuracy was benchmarked against 12-lead ECGs interpreted by two cardiologists.
Main Results:
- Single-lead ECG by radiographers had 60.3% sensitivity and 97.2% specificity for AF detection.
- 12-lead ECG by cardiac nurses demonstrated 97.1% sensitivity and 100% specificity for AF.
- Positive predictive value for single-lead ECG was 53.9%, while for 12-lead ECG it was 100%.
Conclusions:
- Single-lead ECG by radiographers offers high specificity and NPV but moderate sensitivity and PPV for AF screening.
- 12-lead ECG by cardiac nurses shows excellent diagnostic accuracy for AF detection.
- 12-lead ECG interpreted by cardiac nurses is a promising method for diagnosing atrial fibrillation.
Aim:
We examined the diagnostic accuracy of single-lead ECG as assessed by radiographers and 12-lead ECG as assessed by cardiac nurses for the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF).
Methods:
Based on the Danish Cardiovascular Screening Trial, we conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study of 1338 randomly selected Danish men aged 65-74 years with no exclusion criteria. The participants were screened with single-lead ECG during a CT scan assessed by radiographers and 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiac nurses. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated compared with that produced by a 12-lead ECG assessed by two consenting cardiologists.
Results:
The study identified 68 participants with ongoing AF, of whom 60 had self-reported AF and 8 had AF detected in the screening. Single-lead ECG assessed for AF by radiographers had a sensitivity of 60.3% (95% CI 47.7 to 72.0), specificity of 97.2% (95% CI 96.2 to 98.1), positive predictive value (PPV) of 53.9% (95% CI 42.1 to 65.5) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.9% (95% CI 96.9 to 98.6). 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiac nurses had a sensitivity of 97.1% (95% CI 89.8 to 99.6), specificity of 100% (95% CI 99.7 to 100), PPV of 100% (95% CI 94.6 to 100) and NPV of 99.8% (95% CI 99.4 to 100).
Conclusions:
Single-lead ECG assessed by radiographers had a moderate sensitivity and PPV but a very high specificity and NPV. Using radiographers may be acceptable for opportunistic screening, in particular if radiographers are thoroughly trained. Thus, 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiac nurses is a potential diagnostic method for the detection of AF.
Related Concept Videos
Amyloid Fibrils
Amyloid deposits were observed as early as 1639 in the liver and the spleen. In 1854, Rudolph Virchow performed iodine staining,...
Amyloid Fibrils
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

