Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.5K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.5K
Lung Capacity01:47

Lung Capacity

56.2K
The air in the lungs is measured in volumes and capacities. Lung volume measures reflect the amount of air taken in, released, or left over after a lung function, like a single inhalation. Lung capacity measures are sums of two or more lung volume measures.
56.2K
Intelligence01:27

Intelligence

8.5K
The term "intelligence" is complex because it refers to both behavior and individuals, and its interpretation varies across cultures. European Americans tend to link intelligence with reasoning and cognitive skills, while in Kenya, it is tied to responsible participation in family and social life. In Uganda, intelligence is seen as the ability to know the right actions and carry them out effectively, while the Iatmul people of Papua New Guinea associate it with the capacity to remember...
8.5K
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

8.4K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
8.4K
Respiratory Capacities01:24

Respiratory Capacities

1.4K
Respiratory capacities are crucial indicators of lung function, representing the maximum amount of air an individual's respiratory system can handle during various breathing phases.
One key metric is the Inspiratory Capacity (IC), which represents the maximum amount of air that can be inhaled with full effort. IC is calculated by summing the tidal volume and inspiratory reserve volume, typically ranging from 2.4 to 3.6 liters.
The Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) represents the air in the...
1.4K
Multiple Intelligences Theory01:20

Multiple Intelligences Theory

8.9K
Howard Gardner's theory of Multiple Intelligence proposes that there are nine distinct types of intelligence, each reflecting different ways of interacting with the world. Introduced in 1983 and expanded in subsequent years, Gardner's framework challenges the traditional notion of a single, generalized intelligence.
8.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self-reported and task-based measures of attention control are distinct.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Consistently mapped but consistently demanding: Predicting skilled performance.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Task, person, and experiential characteristics drive the transfer of learning.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Recent discoveries on the acquisition of the highest levels of human performance.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Complex span and the n-back lack convergent validity as measures of working memory: Reply to Wilhelm et al. (2025).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

An Examination of Mandatory Class Attendance and Academic Performance in a PharmD Program.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2025
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 26, 2026

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
09:13

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

Published on: May 16, 2017

12.0K

Is working memory capacity a causal factor in fluid intelligence?

Alexander P Burgoyne1, David Z Hambrick2, Erik M Altmann2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. burgoyn4@msu.edu.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|April 24, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Working memory capacity (WMC) does not appear to cause higher reasoning ability, even on complex tasks. This study challenges the capacity hypothesis, suggesting WMC may not be the primary driver of fluid intelligence.

Keywords:
Fluid intelligenceRaven’s matricesReasoning abilityWorking memory capacity

More Related Videos

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

8.4K
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course
11:33

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Published on: July 18, 2014

43.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 26, 2026

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
09:13

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

Published on: May 16, 2017

12.0K
Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

8.4K
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course
11:33

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Published on: July 18, 2014

43.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • A positive correlation exists between working memory capacity (WMC) and reasoning ability.
  • The underlying reasons for this relationship, particularly the causal role of WMC, are debated.
  • The capacity hypothesis posits that higher WMC enables better performance on demanding cognitive tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the capacity hypothesis of working memory's influence on reasoning.
  • To determine if the correlation between WMC and reasoning performance strengthens with increased task demands.
  • To evaluate the causal impact of WMC on fluid intelligence.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Raven's Progressive Matrices to assess reasoning ability.
  • Employed complex span tasks and the k-estimate from the Visual Arrays task to measure WMC.
  • Analyzed the relationship between WMC measures and reasoning performance across varying task complexities.

Main Results:

  • Neither WMC measure supported the capacity hypothesis's prediction.
  • The correlation between WMC and reasoning did not increase with higher task demands.
  • Results were not influenced by performance range restrictions on reasoning items.

Conclusions:

  • The findings question the capacity hypothesis's validity.
  • Evidence suggests WMC may not causally influence fluid intelligence.
  • Re-evaluation of the role of WMC in cognitive abilities is warranted.