Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
Published on: December 15, 2023
How words get meaning: The neural processing of novel object names after sensorimotor training
Laura Bechtold1, Marta Ghio1, Gerald Antoch2
1Institute for Experimental Psychology, Department of Biological Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
Abstract:
The hypothesis that individual experience affects the formation and processing of conceptual representations is controversially debated. Previous training studies with novel tool-like objects have found experience effects on conceptual representations as measured in tasks requiring the processing of object pictures. This study instead explored the neural processing of training-induced word meaning of novel object names. We asked whether the type of experience gained during object concept formation specifically modulates object name processing. In three training sessions with novel tool-like objects, two groups of healthy participants gained either active or observational manipulation experience as well as purely visual experience, while learning pseudowords serving as object names. In an fMRI session after training, participants were presented with the learned novel object names in a lexical decision task. Results revealed that processing novel object names in comparison to meaningless pseudowords elicits a word-like activation pattern in frontal, parietal and temporal regions known to underlie lexical-semantic processing, thus suggesting word meaning formation. Experience-specific modulations did not emerge as regional activation effects. However, a post-hoc analysis revealed that the type of experience (manipulation versus visual) as well as the way, in which the manipulation was learned (active versus observational) led to specific functional connectivity increases between semantic regions and neuronal assemblies in brain areas coding for object manipulation and related visuospatial information. These results suggest that the emergence of conceptual processing for novel object names might be grounded in functional brain networks specifically coding for the experience with their referents.
Related Concept Videos
Naming Enantiomers
Naming Skeletal Muscles
The key factors used in naming muscles include:
Common Names of Aldehydes and Ketones
Common names of aldehydes are derived from the names of their corresponding acid. For instance, the two-carbon aldehyde–acetaldehyde derives its name from the corresponding acid–acetic acid. Similarly, formaldehyde derives its name from formic acid and benzaldehyde from benzoic acid.
Aliphatic ketones are named by suffixing the word “ketone” to the...
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease I: Meaning and Pathophysiology
Potential Due to a Polarized Object
Potential Due to a Magnetized Object
The vector...

