Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

3.2K
Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
3.2K
Convenience Sampling Method00:55

Convenience Sampling Method

11.1K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population.
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
11.1K
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

17.3K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
17.3K
Sampling Methods: Overview01:06

Sampling Methods: Overview

3.3K
A sample refers to a smaller subset representative of a larger population. In analytical chemistry, studying or analyzing an entire population is often impractical or impossible. Therefore, samples are used to draw inferences and generalize the whole population. The sampling method selects individuals or items from a population to create a sample. Standard sampling methods include random, judgemental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling. 
In analytical chemistry, the choice of...
3.3K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

12.7K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
12.7K
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

14.7K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
14.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Can Consumers Rely on AI Chatbots for Food Safety Advice? A Comparative Analysis of Chatbot Responses and Food Safety Specialists' Guidance.

Journal of food protection·2026
Same journal

Dynamics of Toxigenesis and Random Forest Prediction Model for Burkholderia gladioli pathovar cocovenenans in Wet Rice Noodles.

Journal of food protection·2026
Same journal

Impact of surface type and sanitizer use on reduction of Listeria monocytogenes biofilms subjected to varying nutrient availability.

Journal of food protection·2026
Same journal

Risk Ranking of Emerging Hazards in Fresh Produce and Cereal Grains under Climate Change using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA).

Journal of food protection·2026
Same journal

Socioecological Factors Interact to Drive Differences in Hygiene Indicator Load on Retail Fresh Produce Available to Athens, GA Communities.

Journal of food protection·2026
Same journal

Modelling the process and formulation conditions which prevent the outgrowth of non-proteolytic Clostridium botulinum in chilled foods.

Journal of food protection·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 25, 2026

VirWaTest, A Point-of-Use Method for the Detection of Viruses in Water Samples
13:32

VirWaTest, A Point-of-Use Method for the Detection of Viruses in Water Samples

Published on: May 11, 2019

9.0K

Processing Pork Samples for Virus Detection: A Preliminary Study Of Methods.

Ming Yi Deng1

  • 1Hunan Import and Export Commodity Inspection Bureau of the People's Republic of China, Changsha, China.

Journal of Food Protection
|May 5, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study optimized virus recovery from pork. Ultrafiltration and polymer two-phase separation showed higher virus recovery rates than hydroextraction, suggesting improved methods for food safety testing.

More Related Videos

Rapid, Safe, and Simple Manual Bedside Nucleic Acid Extraction for the Detection of Virus in Whole Blood Samples
06:59

Rapid, Safe, and Simple Manual Bedside Nucleic Acid Extraction for the Detection of Virus in Whole Blood Samples

Published on: June 30, 2018

7.7K
Detecting Virus and Salivary Proteins of a Leafhopper Vector in the Plant Host
07:23

Detecting Virus and Salivary Proteins of a Leafhopper Vector in the Plant Host

Published on: September 14, 2021

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 25, 2026

VirWaTest, A Point-of-Use Method for the Detection of Viruses in Water Samples
13:32

VirWaTest, A Point-of-Use Method for the Detection of Viruses in Water Samples

Published on: May 11, 2019

9.0K
Rapid, Safe, and Simple Manual Bedside Nucleic Acid Extraction for the Detection of Virus in Whole Blood Samples
06:59

Rapid, Safe, and Simple Manual Bedside Nucleic Acid Extraction for the Detection of Virus in Whole Blood Samples

Published on: June 30, 2018

7.7K
Detecting Virus and Salivary Proteins of a Leafhopper Vector in the Plant Host
07:23

Detecting Virus and Salivary Proteins of a Leafhopper Vector in the Plant Host

Published on: September 14, 2021

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Food Safety
  • Virology
  • Analytical Chemistry

Background:

  • Accurate detection of viruses in food products like pork is crucial for public health.
  • Existing extraction and concentration methods may have limitations in efficiency and recovery rates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare different extraction and concentration procedures for recovering a model virus from pork samples.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of hydroextraction (HE), ultrafiltration (UF), and polymer two-phase separation (PTPS) for virus recovery.

Main Methods:

  • Pork samples (20g) were experimentally contaminated with poliovirus type 1.
  • Homogenization in glycine-NaOH buffer followed by centrifugation and filtration.
  • Concentration using HE, UF, or PTPS, with virus quantification via plaque assay on HeLa cells.

Main Results:

  • The extraction procedure was effective in recovering viruses.
  • Mean virus recovery rates were 53.0% for HE, 68.0% for UF, and 65.1% for PTPS.
  • No viruses were detected in uninoculated control samples, confirming method specificity.

Conclusions:

  • The developed extraction and concentration methods are effective for virus recovery from pork.
  • Ultrafiltration and polymer two-phase separation offer higher recovery rates compared to hydroextraction.
  • These procedures show promise for routine application in food virology testing and warrant further investigation.