Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

21.2K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
21.2K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

65.4K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
65.4K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

260.9K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
260.9K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

64.9K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.9K
Incomplete Dominance01:43

Incomplete Dominance

29.8K
Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.
29.8K
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

87.6K
Scientific Laws
87.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inhibition of nuclear transcription factor-kappaB by specific IkappaB kinase peptide inhibitor.

Pharmaceutical research·2002
Same author

A perfusion-cell bleeding culture strategy for enhancing the productivity of eicosapentaenoic acid by Nitzschia laevis.

Applied microbiology and biotechnology·2002
Same author

Chemical syntheses of caffeoyl and 5-OH coniferyl aldehydes and alcohols and determination of lignin O-methyltransferase activities in dicot and monocot species.

Phytochemistry·2001
Same author

[Integrin alpha IIb beta 3 and signal transduction of blood platelets].

Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi·2001
Same author

[Experience in 237 patients undergoing infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm operations].

Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]·2001
Same author

MRI based diffusion and perfusion predictive model to estimate stroke evolution.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2001
Same journal

[Strategic considerations for strengthening clinicians' impact on childhood respiratory disease vaccination].

Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chinese journal of preventive medicine]·2026
Same journal

[An analysis of the new U.S. dietary guidelines and their implications for China].

Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chinese journal of preventive medicine]·2026
Same journal

[Genomic evolution and epidemiological patterns of respiratory syncytial virus and their implications for surveillance and early warning].

Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chinese journal of preventive medicine]·2026
Same journal

[Factors influencing severity, therapeutic challenges, and preventive strategies in mucous membrane pemphigoid].

Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chinese journal of preventive medicine]·2026
Same journal

[Research advances of Café-au-lait macules and related syndromes].

Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chinese journal of preventive medicine]·2026
Same journal

[Application of salicylic acid in inflammatory skin diseases and the effect on skin microbiome].

Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chinese journal of preventive medicine]·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Assessing Social Dominance in Mouse Models Using the Tube Test
03:34

Assessing Social Dominance in Mouse Models Using the Tube Test

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.3K

[Statistical P values do not dominate scientific research].

Y Y Wei1, F Chen

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Collaborative Innovation Centre For Cancer Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.

Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi [Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine]
|May 16, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Statistical P values and significance thresholds are debated due to high false positive rates and misunderstandings. Stricter thresholds or abandoning them is ill-advised; understanding statistical uncertainty is key for robust scientific conclusions.

Keywords:
P valuesSignificance levelStatistics

More Related Videos

Quantitative Real-Time PCR using the Thermo Scientific Solaris qPCR Assay
09:21

Quantitative Real-Time PCR using the Thermo Scientific Solaris qPCR Assay

Published on: June 17, 2010

50.5K
Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

6.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Assessing Social Dominance in Mouse Models Using the Tube Test
03:34

Assessing Social Dominance in Mouse Models Using the Tube Test

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.3K
Quantitative Real-Time PCR using the Thermo Scientific Solaris qPCR Assay
09:21

Quantitative Real-Time PCR using the Thermo Scientific Solaris qPCR Assay

Published on: June 17, 2010

50.5K
Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

6.0K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics in scientific research
  • Biomedical research methodology

Background:

  • The statistical P value and its threshold are subjects of ongoing global controversy.
  • Recent debates are fueled by high false positive rates in biomedical research and widespread misunderstanding of statistical significance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the controversy surrounding statistical P values and significance thresholds.
  • To argue against the proposed solutions of more stringent significance levels or abandoning their use.
  • To emphasize the correct understanding and application of statistical P values in scientific decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • The study critically evaluates current debates on statistical significance.
  • It analyzes the implications of proposed changes to significance thresholds.
  • It advocates for a deeper understanding of statistical uncertainty.

Main Results:

  • The paper argues that tightening significance levels (e.g., from 0.05 to 0.005) or abandoning them is counterproductive.
  • It posits that these suggestions lead to more subjective and difficult scientific decision-making.
  • The core finding is that statistical P values should be used with a correct understanding of statistical uncertainty.

Conclusions:

  • Statistical significance is an "honest assistant" not the sole determinant of scientific value.
  • Effective scientific decision-making relies on sound experimental design, rigorous implementation, transparent analysis, and synthesis of diverse information.
  • Correctly interpreting statistical P values within the framework of uncertainty is crucial for advancing science.