Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

12.5K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
12.5K
Self Within Cultural Contexts01:30

Self Within Cultural Contexts

222
Cultural frameworks for understanding the self are often categorized into two broad orientations: individualism and collectivism. These paradigms influence how people define themselves, relate to others, and interpret their social worlds. Each orientation offers distinct perspectives on autonomy, responsibility, and the role of the individual within a community.Individualistic CulturesIn individualistic cultures like North America and Western Europe, identity is understood as autonomous and...
222
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

14.9K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
14.9K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.1K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.1K
Impact of Social Context on Individuals01:21

Impact of Social Context on Individuals

289
Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...
289
System of Memory01:23

System of Memory

7.3K
Memory is categorized into three major systems: sensory memory, short-term memory (STM), and long-term memory (LTM). These systems differ in their capacity and the duration for which they can hold information. Sensory memory captures raw sensory input from the environment, holding it for just a few seconds or less. For example, on hearing a brief, loud sound, like a car horn honking, the sound seems to linger in the mind for a moment even after it stops. This is an instance of sensory memory...
7.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Limited cue integration in metacognitive control decisions.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Mending metacognitive illusions in JOLs: when neither cognitive nor metacognitive feedback is effective.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same author

Nailing Down the Perceptual Explanation of the Date/Delay Effect in Temporal Discounting.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same author

Multinomial models of the repetition-based truth effect: Investigating the role of prior knowledge.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Extensions of multinomial processing tree models for continuous variables: A simulation study comparing parametric and non-parametric approaches.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same journal

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Test Format Matching Moderates the Forward Testing Effect.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Affective-Motivational Task Content and Stimulus Size Modulate Cognitive Control in Task Switching.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Violent Virtual Avatar Experience on Players' Response Inhibition to Angry Expressions and Its Cognitive Neural Mechanisms.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Same Person, Different Personality?

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Competition Matters!

Experimental psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Olfactory Context Dependent Memory: Direct Presentation of Odorants
04:47

Olfactory Context Dependent Memory: Direct Presentation of Odorants

Published on: September 18, 2018

7.1K

Testing Hypotheses About Binding in Context Memory With a Hierarchical Multinomial Modeling Approach.

Nina R Arnold1, Daniel W Heck1, Arndt Bröder1

  • 11 Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Germany.

Experimental Psychology
|May 18, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Stochastic dependency in multidimensional source memory is confirmed, ruling out artifact explanations. However, the study did not differentiate between feature-feature and item-context binding accounts.

Keywords:
Bayesian inferencecontext bindingcontext memoryhierarchical modelingindividual differencesmultinomial modeling

More Related Videos

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
09:13

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

Published on: May 16, 2017

12.0K
Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Olfactory Context Dependent Memory: Direct Presentation of Odorants
04:47

Olfactory Context Dependent Memory: Direct Presentation of Odorants

Published on: September 18, 2018

7.1K
A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
09:13

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

Published on: May 16, 2017

12.0K
Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Multidimensional source memory research has shown stochastic dependencies between memory for different episode facets.
  • This suggests integrated representations and mutual cuing in context retrieval.
  • However, prior studies yielded mixed results regarding feature binding, with some suggesting unbound features.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test an artifact explanation for stochastic dependency in source memory by accounting for interindividual differences.
  • To investigate the nature of feature binding by comparing integrated versus separate feature encoding conditions.
  • To determine if integrated representations involve feature-feature binding or item-context binding.

Main Methods:

  • Applied a hierarchical multinomial model to analyze data from multidimensional source memory experiments.
  • Compared stochastic dependency levels between encoding conditions with integrated versus separate feature judgments.
  • Replicated previous findings of stochastic dependency in source memory.

Main Results:

  • The study confirmed the existence of stochastic dependency in multidimensional source memory.
  • This finding ruled out the artifact explanation based on aggregated interindividual differences.
  • No significant difference in stochastic dependency was found between integrated and separate feature encoding conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Stochastic dependency in source memory is a genuine phenomenon, not solely an artifact of aggregation.
  • The current experimental design did not provide sufficient evidence to distinguish between feature-feature binding and item-context binding models.
  • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms of feature binding in episodic memory.