Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Pilot In Vitro Study to Assess Cleaning Ability and Effects of Different Decontamination Methods on Implant Surfaces
Published on: November 21, 2025
Assessing effects of scanner upgrades for clinical studies
Kathryn E Keenan1, Zydrunas Gimbutas2, Andrew Dienstfrey2
1Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Background:
Scanner upgrades due to software and hardware changes are an inevitable part of MR research and, without quality assurance protocols, can jeopardize studies.
Purpose:
To evaluate changes in T1 relaxation time by inversion recovery (IR) and variable flip angle (VFA) measurements on a 3T system that underwent an "everything but the magnet" upgrade.
Study Type:
Longitudinal.
Phantom:
An International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / National Institute of Standards and Technology (ISMRM/NIST) system phantom with repeated measurements across multiple (n = 3) days.
Field Strength/Sequence:
T1 IR, VFA at 3T.
Assessment:
The T1 measurements by IR and VFA were compared with the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements, which constitute the known values for the ISMRM/NIST system phantom, to determine the measurement error.
Statistical Tests:
Descriptive.
Results:
The T1 VFA measurement errors were distributed around zero (-15% to +10%) on the original system and then the errors were distributed entirely above zero post-upgrade (+5% to 30%). The T1 IR results had a dramatic increase in error distribution (±5% original, ±20% post-upgrade) prior to the identification of signal saturation as an issue. Once the signal saturation was accounted for, the T1 IR errors decreased to ±10% post-upgrade.
Data Conclusion:
The T1 VFA measurement differences between the original and post-upgrade systems can be entirely attributed to contributions from B1 . The T1 IR measurements demonstrate the need for quantitative quality assurance (QA) processes. The site under study passed the QA protocols in place, which did not identify the increased T1 error, nor the signal saturation issue. To improve on this study, we would make systematic, quantitative measurements at intervals less than a year and following any hardware or software upgrade.
Level Of Evidence:
1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1948-1954.
Related Concept Videos
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.

