Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quantum Numbers02:43

Quantum Numbers

49.5K
It is said that the energy of an electron in an atom is quantized; that is, it can be equal only to certain specific values and can jump from one energy level to another but not transition smoothly or stay between these levels.
49.5K
The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom02:45

The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom

56.8K
Shortly after de Broglie published his ideas that the electron in a hydrogen atom could be better thought of as being a circular standing wave instead of a particle moving in quantized circular orbits, Erwin Schrödinger extended de Broglie’s work by deriving what is now known as the Schrödinger equation. When Schrödinger applied his equation to hydrogen-like atoms, he was able to reproduce Bohr’s expression for the energy and, thus, the Rydberg formula governing hydrogen spectra.
56.8K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

9.9K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.9K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.1K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.1K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.1K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Alterations in Metabolites Associated With Umbilical Cord Blood in Monozygotic Twins Discordant for Congenital Heart Disease.

Pediatric discovery·2026
Same author

What are the primary roles of peroxidases in enzymatic browning of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables, browning promoters or ROS scavengers?

Frontiers in nutrition·2026
Same author

No cloning of quantum ensembles.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Atrophy of specific amygdala subregion precedes the conversion from mild cognitive impairment with neuropsychiatric symptoms to dementia.

International psychogeriatrics·2026
Same author

Finite element analysis of impacted canine disimpaction: effects of anchorage systems and T-loop gable bend angles.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology·2026
Same author

Molecular characterization of a rare heterozygous <i>APOA5</i> variant in a Chinese family with moderate hypertriglyceridemia.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

Erratum: Bacterial Turbulence at Compressible Fluid Interfaces [Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 138301 (2026)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Unveiling Light-Quark Yukawa Flavor Structure via Dihadron Fragmentation at Lepton Colliders.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Adaptable Route to Fast Coherent State Transport via Bang-Bang-Bang Protocols.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Topological Transition and Emergence of Elasticity of Dislocation in Skyrmion Lattice: Beyond Kittel's Magnetic-Polar Analogy.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Pound-Drever-Hall Method for Superconducting-Qubit Readout.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Coupling a ^{73}Ge Nuclear Spin to an Electrostatically Defined Quantum Dot in Silicon.

Physical review letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Gradient Echo Quantum Memory in Warm Atomic Vapor
10:00

Gradient Echo Quantum Memory in Warm Atomic Vapor

Published on: November 11, 2013

13.2K

Error-Mitigated Digital Quantum Simulation.

Sam McArdle1, Xiao Yuan1, Simon Benjamin1

  • 1Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, United Kingdom.

Physical Review Letters
|May 31, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a new quantum error detection method to improve simulations on near-term quantum computers. This stabilizerlike technique effectively identifies depolarizing errors, enhancing computational accuracy.

More Related Videos

Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation
08:45

Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation

Published on: July 21, 2014

14.0K
Production and Targeting of Monovalent Quantum Dots
10:16

Production and Targeting of Monovalent Quantum Dots

Published on: October 23, 2014

26.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Gradient Echo Quantum Memory in Warm Atomic Vapor
10:00

Gradient Echo Quantum Memory in Warm Atomic Vapor

Published on: November 11, 2013

13.2K
Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation
08:45

Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation

Published on: July 21, 2014

14.0K
Production and Targeting of Monovalent Quantum Dots
10:16

Production and Targeting of Monovalent Quantum Dots

Published on: October 23, 2014

26.0K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum computing
  • Quantum error correction

Background:

  • Variational algorithms offer potential for simulating complex problems on near-future quantum hardware.
  • Hardware errors currently limit the practical application and accuracy of these quantum algorithms.
  • Efficient error mitigation strategies are essential for realizing the potential of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel stabilizerlike method for detecting errors in quantum computations.
  • To assess the effectiveness of this method in mitigating depolarizing errors on near-term quantum hardware.
  • To evaluate the method's performance under various noise models and in conjunction with existing techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a stabilizerlike error detection protocol.
  • Simulations of quantum algorithms incorporating the proposed error detection method.
  • Analysis of error detection efficiency for depolarizing errors (60%-80%).
  • Assessment of performance under stochastic and correlated noise conditions.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method can detect a significant portion (60%-80%) of depolarizing errors.
  • The technique is compatible with the constraints of near-term quantum hardware.
  • Simulations demonstrate substantial improvements in calculation accuracy when using the method, particularly with combined noise.
  • The approach shows synergistic benefits when integrated with established error mitigation strategies.

Conclusions:

  • The developed stabilizerlike method offers a practical approach to mitigate errors in variational quantum algorithms.
  • This technique enhances the reliability of quantum simulations on current and upcoming quantum hardware.
  • The error detection strategy is robust against different noise types and complements existing mitigation approaches, paving the way for more accurate quantum computations.