Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Measurement of the Pressure-volume Curve in Mouse Lungs
Published on: January 27, 2015
Accuracy of small tidal volume measurement comparing two ventilator airway sensors
Mark J Heulitt1, Shirley J Holt2, Tracy L Thurman1
1Section of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Abstract:
Goals of modern mechanical ventilation in infants focus on preventing over-distention by limiting tidal volume. Accurate measurement of these volumes is essential. We hypothesized that tidal volume accuracy differs dependent upon the type of airway sensor utilized in tidal volumes less than 10 mL. Intubated, sedated Sprague Dawley rats (n = 40) were ventilated utilizing both control and support ventilator modes. Accuracy of volume delivery was compared between a fixed orifice flow sensor (FOF) and a hot wire anemometer (HWA) to a Hans Rudolph linear pneumotachograph positioned at the patient wye. Rats median weight was 476 grams (range 370-544), tidal volume (V T ) 3.5 mL (1.2-11.4), f 50 (18-102), and PIP 9.5 cm H 2 O (1-34). Across all modes, bias and precision were HWA -0.76, 1.09; FOF 0.22, 0.61. This study confirms that there are differences in the accuracy of small tidal volumes measured with a FOF as compared to a HWA. Utilizing a FOF, control modes exhibit improved precision and decreased bias as compared to support modes.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Tidal Forces
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...

