Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Coronary Artery Revascularization
Published on: September 15, 2023
Uncertainty quantification of simulated biomechanical stimuli in coronary artery bypass grafts
Justin S Tran1, Daniele E Schiavazzi2, Andrew M Kahn3
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Insights
Saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) used in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery have high failure rates. This study quantifies mechanical stress and strain uncertainties in SVGs, finding wall shear stress is predictable but wall strain varies significantly.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Computational Fluid Dynamics
- Cardiovascular Research
Background:
- Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery uses saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) with high failure rates (up to 40% in 10 years).
- Mechanical stimuli differences in grafts are linked to endothelial damage and thrombus formation, impacting graft patency.
- Existing multi-scale coronary models lack uncertainty quantification for physiological parameters.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess confidence in multi-scale model predictions of wall shear stress and wall strain in SVGs.
- To quantify uncertainty propagation from peripheral hemodynamics and material properties to graft performance.
- To develop a stochastic submodeling approach for efficient uncertainty analysis in bypass grafts.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a stochastic submodeling approach for computational efficiency, focusing on bypass grafts.
- Computed boundary condition distributions by assimilating uncertain clinical data.
- Modeled spatial variations in vessel wall stiffness using a random field approximation.
- Employed a multi-resolution approach for forward uncertainty propagation.
Main Results:
- Time- and space-averaged wall shear stress predictions showed good estimation with a coefficient of variation under 35%.
- Uncertainty in wall elastic modulus and thickness distributions led to significant variations in wall strain, with coefficients of variation up to 100%.
- Sensitivity analysis identified key interactions between flow and material parameters driving output variability.
Conclusions:
- While wall shear stress in SVGs is relatively predictable, significant uncertainty exists in predicting wall strain due to material property variations.
- The stochastic submodeling approach effectively quantifies uncertainty in multi-scale cardiovascular models.
- Understanding parameter uncertainty is crucial for improving the design and predicting the long-term performance of coronary artery bypass grafts.
Abstract:
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is performed on more than 400,000 patients annually in the U.S. However, saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) implanted during CABG exhibit poor patency compared to arterial grafts, with failure rates up to 40% within 10 years after surgery. Differences in mechanical stimuli are known to play a role in driving maladaptation and have been correlated with endothelial damage and thrombus formation. As these quantities are difficult to measure in vivo, multi-scale coronary models offer a way to quantify them, while accounting for complex coronary physiology. However, prior studies have primarily focused on deterministic evaluations, without reporting variability in the model parameters due to uncertainty. This study aims to assess confidence in multi-scale predictions of wall shear stress and wall strain while accounting for uncertainty in peripheral hemodynamics and material properties. Boundary condition distributions are computed by assimilating uncertain clinical data, while spatial variations of vessel wall stiffness are obtained through approximation by a random field. We developed a stochastic submodeling approach to mitigate the computational burden of repeated multi-scale model evaluations to focus exclusively on the bypass grafts. This produces a two-level decomposition of quantities of interest into submodel contributions and full model/submodel discrepancies. We leverage these two levels in the context of forward uncertainty propagation using a previously proposed multi-resolution approach. The time- and space-averaged wall shear stress is well estimated with a coefficient of variation of <35%, but ignorance about the spatial distribution on the wall elastic modulus and thickness lead to large variations in an objective measure of wall strain, with coefficients of variation up to 100%. Sensitivity analysis reveals how the interactions between the flow and material parameters contribute to output variability.
More Related Videos
09:12Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
12:00Evaluation of a Novel Laser-assisted Coronary Anastomotic Connector - the Trinity Clip - in a Porcine Off-pump Bypass Model
Published on: November 24, 2014
Related Concept Videos
The Uncertainty Principle
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations