Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

100.3K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
100.3K
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

14.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
14.5K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures03:34

Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures

80.6K
All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.
80.6K
What is the Immune System?01:38

What is the Immune System?

127.1K
Overview
127.1K
Data Reporting and Recording01:24

Data Reporting and Recording

5.4K
Reporting and recording are crucial in data documentation. The timely, thorough, and accurate documentation of facts is essential when recording patient data. Failure to record findings during an assessment or interpretation of a problem will result in loss of information and make the patient document unreliable. The reader is left with general impressions if the information is not specific. A recording is documenting data of the individual's health information in a traceable, secure, and...
5.4K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

13.4K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
13.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multicancer Early Detection Screening Tools: Not Economically Efficient, Not Ethically Equitable, Marginally Medically Effective.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2024
Same author

Vexing Vaccine Ethics: Denying ICU Care to Vaccine Refusers.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2024
Same author

Bioethics and Public Policy: Is There Hope for Public Reason?

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2024
Same author

Public Reason, Bioethics, and Public Policy: A Seductive Delusion or Ambitious Aspiration?

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2024
Same author

Teaching Bioethics Today: Waking from Dogmatic Curricular Slumbers.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2023
Same author

Precision Medicine and Rough Justice: Wicked Problems.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2023
Same journal

Sentience. Not Necessarily a Problem?

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

No Need to Feel.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

The One Health Paradigm and Wild Animal Welfare Science.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

From Mollusks to Machines: An Ethical Framework Focused on the Urgency of Extreme Suffering.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

Sentience and Why It Matters.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

The Wrong Motives for Potentially Harming a Being.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Precise, High-throughput Analysis of Bacterial Growth
09:00

Precise, High-throughput Analysis of Bacterial Growth

Published on: September 19, 2017

24.8K

Precision QALYs, Precisely Unjust.

Leonard M Fleck

    Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics : CQ : the International Journal of Healthcare Ethics Committees
    |July 13, 2019
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Personalized Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) may seem fair but could lead to greater injustice in healthcare resource allocation. Cost-effectiveness analysis alone is insufficient for just healthcare decisions.

    Keywords:
    National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)cost effectivenesshealth care justiceindividualized QALYspersonalized QALYstargeted cancer therapiesutilitarianism

    More Related Videos

    Author Spotlight: A Precise and Quantifiable Method for Collecting Hemolymph from Small Arthropods
    03:39

    Author Spotlight: A Precise and Quantifiable Method for Collecting Hemolymph from Small Arthropods

    Published on: April 28, 2023

    2.6K
    Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
    09:36

    Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

    Published on: June 4, 2020

    3.5K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jan 22, 2026

    Precise, High-throughput Analysis of Bacterial Growth
    09:00

    Precise, High-throughput Analysis of Bacterial Growth

    Published on: September 19, 2017

    24.8K
    Author Spotlight: A Precise and Quantifiable Method for Collecting Hemolymph from Small Arthropods
    03:39

    Author Spotlight: A Precise and Quantifiable Method for Collecting Hemolymph from Small Arthropods

    Published on: April 28, 2023

    2.6K
    Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
    09:36

    Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

    Published on: June 4, 2020

    3.5K

    Area of Science:

    • Health Economics
    • Bioethics
    • Public Health Policy

    Background:

    • Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) are standard for population-level healthcare resource allocation.
    • Current UK National Health Service (NHS) threshold is £30,000 per QALY.
    • Warwick Heale proposes individualized QALYs based on patient-specific outcomes and values.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically evaluate Warwick Heale's proposal for individualized and personalized QALYs.
    • To examine the ethical implications of using personalized QALYs in healthcare resource allocation.
    • To argue that individualized QALYs may lead to greater injustice.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of Heale's arguments on personalized QALYs.
    • Ethical critique of cost-effectiveness analysis in healthcare allocation.
    • Exploration of fairness and social utility in resource distribution.

    Main Results:

    • Individualized QALYs could result in differential treatment within patient cohorts.
    • Personal values (religious or otherwise) influencing QALY valuation raise ethical concerns.
    • Strict adherence to personalized QALYs may not align with broader social utility.

    Conclusions:

    • Heale's proposals for personalized QALYs risk creating greater injustice in healthcare resource allocation.
    • Fairness in healthcare requires more than just cost-effectiveness analysis.
    • The ethical requirements for just healthcare resource allocation are complex and multifaceted.