Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Expected Value01:15

Expected Value

7.4K
The expected value is known as the "long-term" average or mean. This means that over the long term of experimenting over and over, you would expect this average. The expected average is represented by the symbol μ. It is calculated as follows:
7.4K
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins02:26

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

14.1K
Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain.  Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...
14.1K
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

2.5K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.5K
Three-Domain System of Life01:21

Three-Domain System of Life

925
Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequence analysis revealed three distinct groups of cells: eukaryotes, bacteria, and archaea. In 1978, Carl R. Woese proposed the concept of domains, a taxonomic level above kingdoms, to differentiate these groups. He suggested that archaea and bacteria, despite their similar appearance, represent separate domains. Domains differ in rRNA, membrane lipid structure, transfer RNA, and antibiotic sensitivity.In this classification, animals, plants, and fungi belong to the...
925
Membrane Domains01:18

Membrane Domains

7.0K
The membrane domains concentrate specific lipids and proteins at one place within the membrane, which helps in cell signaling, adhesion, and other critical cellular processes. These domains can differ in size, composition, function, and lifespan.
Protein Domains
The membrane comprises a group of distinct proteins responsible for carrying out a cell's specific function. For example, the plasma membrane of the human sperm, or a single germ cell, contains a unique set of proteins in the...
7.0K
Three Developmental Domains01:29

Three Developmental Domains

1.0K
Human development is typically examined across three main domains: physical, cognitive, and socio-emotional. These domains represent the significant areas of change and continuity throughout the lifespan, from infancy to late adulthood.
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differentiating Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma with Synchronous or Metachronous Bladder Cancer.

Current issues in molecular biology·2026
Same author

Massive Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Secondary to Aortoenteric Fistula.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Evolutionary analysis of CD300A and CD300C paired receptors in primates.

Frontiers in immunology·2025
Same author

Is It About Speech or About Prediction? Testing Between Two Accounts of the Rhythm-Reading Link.

Brain sciences·2025
Same author

More than a Bundle? Developing Adaptive Guidance for Task Selection in an Online, Semantic-Based Cognitive Stimulation Program.

Brain sciences·2025
Same author

Does music training improve emotion recognition and cognitive abilities? Longitudinal and correlational evidence from children.

Cognition·2025
Same journal

Anterior Cingulate Cortex Mediates State-Dependent Prioritization of Distressed Conspecifics.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Hemispherotomy for Pediatric Post-Traumatic Epilepsy.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

When Robots Learn: Artificial Intelligence and the Next Human-Centered Era of Neurorehabilitation.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

The Association Between Changes in White Matter Microstructure and Cognitive Function in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond Ventricular Enlargement: Multimodal MRI Assessment Improves Surgical Decision-Making in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

The Effects of Personalized Observation, Execution, and Mental Imagery (POEM) Therapy in Logopenic Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Telepractice-Based Single-Case Study.

Brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

13.0K

Domain-Specific Expectations in Music Segmentation.

Susana Silva1, Carolina Dias2, São Luís Castro3

  • 1Center for Psychology at University of Porto (CPUP), Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal. susanamsilva@fpce.up.pt.

Brain Sciences
|July 20, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Music and speech share acoustic cues for phrase segmentation. However, this study reveals distinct segmentation modes influenced by domain-specific expectations, highlighting top-down influences in music processing.

Keywords:
MelodyPerceptionPhrasingProsody

More Related Videos

Assessing the Effects of Music Listening on Psychobiological Stress in Daily Life
07:17

Assessing the Effects of Music Listening on Psychobiological Stress in Daily Life

Published on: February 2, 2017

13.7K
Immunization of Alpacas Lama pacos with Protein Antigens and Production of Antigen-specific Single Domain Antibodies
05:27

Immunization of Alpacas Lama pacos with Protein Antigens and Production of Antigen-specific Single Domain Antibodies

Published on: January 26, 2019

24.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

13.0K
Assessing the Effects of Music Listening on Psychobiological Stress in Daily Life
07:17

Assessing the Effects of Music Listening on Psychobiological Stress in Daily Life

Published on: February 2, 2017

13.7K
Immunization of Alpacas Lama pacos with Protein Antigens and Production of Antigen-specific Single Domain Antibodies
05:27

Immunization of Alpacas Lama pacos with Protein Antigens and Production of Antigen-specific Single Domain Antibodies

Published on: January 26, 2019

24.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • Music Psychology

Background:

  • Acoustic cues like pauses and pitch movements guide phrase boundary assignment in both music and speech.
  • Research has primarily focused on shared neural resources for music and speech prosody segmentation, suggesting overlapping mechanisms.
  • The role of music-specific expectations in segmentation, beyond acoustic cues, remains underexplored, potentially challenging a purely bottom-up view.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether domain-specific expectations influence music segmentation.
  • To compare segmentation of ambiguous stimuli presented as either speech prosody or music.
  • To examine the impact of instructional context on delexicalization effects in segmentation.

Main Methods:

  • Ambiguous auditory stimuli were presented to participants under two distinct instructional conditions: speech prosody or music.
  • Segmentation patterns were analyzed for each condition and compared to a natural speech reference.
  • The study focused on how instructional context modulated delexicalization effects on segmentation.

Main Results:

  • Significant interactions were observed between delexicalization (removal of phonetic content) and instructional context across most segmentation indices.
  • These interactions suggest the existence of a distinct 'music mode' of segmentation, differing from a 'speech prosody mode'.
  • Findings indicate that the way stimuli are perceived (as music or speech) influences how phrase boundaries are identified.

Conclusions:

  • Domain-specific expectations, or top-down influences, play a crucial role in music segmentation.
  • The analogy between music and speech prosody segmentation requires re-evaluation, as distinct processing modes appear to be engaged.
  • This research underscores the importance of considering cognitive context in auditory perception and segmentation.