Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Structural Protein Function01:56

Structural Protein Function

29.8K
Structural proteins are a category of proteins responsible for functions ranging from cell shape and movement to providing support to major structures such as bones, cartilage, hair, and muscles. This group includes proteins such as collagen, actin, myosin, and keratin.
Collagen, the most abundant protein in mammals, is found throughout the body. In connective tissue, such as skin, ligaments, and tendons, it provides tensile strength and elasticity.  In bones and teeth, it mineralizes to...
29.8K
Structural Protein Function01:56

Structural Protein Function

3.2K
3.2K
Mechanical Protein Functions01:58

Mechanical Protein Functions

5.5K
Proteins perform many mechanical functions in a cell. These proteins can be classified into two general categories- proteins that generate mechanical forces and proteins that are subjected to mechanical forces. Proteins providing mechanical support to the structure of the cell, such as keratin, are subjected to mechanical force, whereas proteins involved in cell movement and transport of molecules across cell membranes, such as an ion pump, are examples of generating mechanical force. 
5.5K
Mechanical Protein Function01:58

Mechanical Protein Function

2.5K
2.5K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.3K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.3K
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

13.7K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Artificial metalloenzymes in complex biological environments.

Nature chemical biology·2026
Same author

<i>De novo</i> grafted coiled-coil peptides as p53/<i>h</i>DM2 inhibitors.

RSC chemical biology·2026
Same author

Enzyme-Free Phosphorylation with Kinetic Gating in a De Novo Coiled-Coil System.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Kinesin-1 conformational dynamics are controlled by a cargo-sensitive TPR switch.

eLife·2026
Same author

Sequence Prediction, Structural Modelling and the Challenges of Plasticity in Coiled Coils.

Sub-cellular biochemistry·2026
Same author

<i>De novo</i> designed 3-helix bundle peptides and proteins with controlled topology and stability.

Chemical science·2025
Same journal

Function through shape: An overview of DNA G-quadruplexes in transcriptional regulation.

Current opinion in chemical biology·2026
Same journal

Advances in tools and technologies for multiplexed bioluminescence imaging.

Current opinion in chemical biology·2026
Same journal

High-resolution molecular mapping by expansion-coupled label-free and multimodal imaging.

Current opinion in chemical biology·2026
Same journal

Recent advances in glycoconjugate-based therapeutics.

Current opinion in chemical biology·2026
Same journal

Towards better red emitters for bioimaging: Innovations in rhodamine and cyanine chemistry.

Current opinion in chemical biology·2026
Same journal

Chemigenetic fluorescent biosensors in biological imaging - New trends and advances.

Current opinion in chemical biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.6K

Towards functional de novo designed proteins.

William M Dawson1, Guto G Rhys1, Derek N Woolfson2

  • 1School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK.

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
|July 24, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

De novo protein design is advancing, but creating functional proteins remains challenging. Future designs require integrating structure, stability, and function with multi-state modeling and dynamics.

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

974
A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia
05:51

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia

Published on: June 15, 2011

26.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.6K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

974
A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia
05:51

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia

Published on: June 15, 2011

26.4K

Area of Science:

  • Protein engineering
  • Biochemistry
  • Computational biology

Background:

  • De novo protein design methods, including minimal, rational, and computational approaches, have rapidly advanced.
  • High-resolution characterization of various protein scaffolds has been achieved, marking significant progress in the field.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the challenge of creating functional de novo proteins with specific binding or catalytic activities.
  • To explore new strategies for simultaneously designing protein structure, stability, and function.
  • To incorporate multi-state modeling and dynamics into design methods to mimic natural protein complexity.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current de novo protein design approaches (minimal, rational, computational).
  • Analysis of challenges in achieving functional de novo protein designs.
  • Discussion of the need for integrated approaches targeting structure, stability, and function.
  • Emphasis on incorporating multi-state modeling and protein dynamics into design methodologies.

Main Results:

  • Significant progress has been made in de novo protein scaffold design, with various structures characterized.
  • Key challenges remain in designing proteins with specific functions, such as selective binding or catalysis.
  • Current methods may be insufficient, necessitating new approaches that consider structure, stability, and function concurrently.

Conclusions:

  • Achieving functional de novo proteins requires novel strategies beyond simply adding functional groups to existing scaffolds.
  • Future advancements depend on integrating multi-state modeling and understanding protein dynamics for precise control.
  • Mimicking the sophistication of natural proteins necessitates a deeper understanding and application of conformational changes and dynamics in design.