Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.1K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.1K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

17.5K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
17.5K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.9K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.5K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.5K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

14.2K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
14.2K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

241
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
241

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all connectivity.

Nature·2026
Same author

Using Discharge From the Emergency Department or Admission of Less Than 24 Hours as a Metric for Inappropriate Helicopter Emergency Medical Services Utilization in Adult Trauma Patients Transported to the Emergency Department.

Air medical journal·2026
Same author

3-D printed aseptic injection system for capillary electrophoresis.

Talanta·2025
Same author

Anterolateral Papillary Muscle Rupture: A Rare Complication of Myocardial Infarction.

JACC. Case reports·2025
Same author

Nanoparticle-driven growth enhances mechanical properties of flax stems.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Measuring error rates of mid-circuit measurements.

Nature communications·2025
Same journal

Erratum: Bacterial Turbulence at Compressible Fluid Interfaces [Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 138301 (2026)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Unveiling Light-Quark Yukawa Flavor Structure via Dihadron Fragmentation at Lepton Colliders.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Adaptable Route to Fast Coherent State Transport via Bang-Bang-Bang Protocols.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Topological Transition and Emergence of Elasticity of Dislocation in Skyrmion Lattice: Beyond Kittel's Magnetic-Polar Analogy.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Pound-Drever-Hall Method for Superconducting-Qubit Readout.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Coupling a ^{73}Ge Nuclear Spin to an Electrostatically Defined Quantum Dot in Silicon.

Physical review letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Direct Infusion Device for Molecule Delivery in Plants
08:52

Author Spotlight: Direct Infusion Device for Molecule Delivery in Plants

Published on: June 2, 2023

3.0K

Direct Randomized Benchmarking for Multiqubit Devices.

Timothy J Proctor1, Arnaud Carignan-Dugas2, Kenneth Rudinger3

  • 1Quantum Performance Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California 94550, USA.

Physical Review Letters
|August 7, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new direct randomized benchmarking (RB) protocol scales to more qubits than standard Clifford RB. This method benchmarks multiqubit quantum processors more effectively, providing a flexible error rate for gate sets.

More Related Videos

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
08:53

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.6K
Thermal Measurement Techniques in Analytical Microfluidic Devices
08:29

Thermal Measurement Techniques in Analytical Microfluidic Devices

Published on: June 3, 2015

10.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Direct Infusion Device for Molecule Delivery in Plants
08:52

Author Spotlight: Direct Infusion Device for Molecule Delivery in Plants

Published on: June 2, 2023

3.0K
Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
08:53

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.6K
Thermal Measurement Techniques in Analytical Microfluidic Devices
08:29

Thermal Measurement Techniques in Analytical Microfluidic Devices

Published on: June 3, 2015

10.1K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Information Science
  • Quantum Computing
  • Quantum Error Characterization

Background:

  • Assessing quantum processor performance requires scalable benchmarking methods.
  • Clifford randomized benchmarking (RB) is the industry standard but struggles to scale beyond a few qubits due to compilation inefficiencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and experimentally validate a direct randomized benchmarking (RB) protocol for efficiently benchmarking multiqubit quantum processors.
  • To provide a more informative and flexible error rate compared to traditional Clifford RB.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed a direct RB protocol using random native gate circuits seeded by Clifford-like randomization, minimizing compilation overhead.
  • Experimentally demonstrated the protocol on a 2- to 5-qubit system using the ibmqx5 quantum processor.
  • Performed simulations for 10+ qubit systems to show scalability.

Main Results:

  • Successfully benchmarked quantum processors up to five qubits, a significant increase over previous Clifford RB implementations.
  • The protocol successfully estimated an error rate from exponential decay, similar to Clifford RB.
  • Demonstrated the protocol's flexibility by measuring separate error rates for distinct gate sets, including CNOT gates.

Conclusions:

  • The direct RB protocol offers a practical and scalable solution for benchmarking larger quantum processors.
  • This method provides a more direct and flexible error metric, crucial for advancing quantum hardware development.
  • The protocol's ability to benchmark more qubits on accessible hardware marks a significant step in quantum processor assessment.