[Comparison of 3 methods of blood pressure measurement in obesity]

Arm girth and circumference often leads to difficulties in Blood Pressure (BP) measurement in obese patients. In order to assess the best method of BP measurement, we have compared in a triplicate study, Intra-arterial Pressure (INTRA) to indirect measurements: Mercury Sphygmomanometer (SPH) and oscillometric device Bard Sentron (SEN). SPH and SEN were successively connected to the same cuff (inflatable bladder 14 x 31 cm). Cuff was positioned on contralateral arm to arterial puncture. 19 subjects were studied (18 female); mean age was 51.3 +/- 9 years (extremes: 37-69), mean weight 104 +/- 19 kg (84-147), weight index 40 +/- 4.7 kg/m2 (34-49), and brachial circumference 39 +/- 4 cm (33-47). First out-patient mean blood pressure measurement was 182/104 mmHg (148-264/80-132). Mean SPH BP were 158 +/- 34/91 +/- 3 (98-230, 72-112) and mean INTRA: 171 +/- 37/85 +/- 5 (122-256/56-118). Mean systolic and diastolic differences (S, D, mmHg) were: (Table: see text). 1) SPH systolic BP underestimates HUM systolic BP. 2) Mean SEN measurements are very closed to HUM values. 3) A great intra-individual variability occurs since more than 50 per cent systolic SPH values show discrepancy of more than 10 mmHg for systolic and diastolic HUM BP; the same discrepancies occur for SEN vs HUM. 4) Differences between couples of values (HUM-SEN, HUM-SPH) are not correlated to BP level, neither for systolic nor for diastolic BP. 5) No significant correlation occurs when BP deltas are compared to weight index or arm circumference.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)