Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Murine Oropharyngeal Aspiration Model of Ventilator-associated and Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia
Published on: June 28, 2018
Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in Critical and Progressive Care: Avoidable Versus Unavoidable
Joyce Pittman1, Terrie Beeson2, Jill Dillon2
1Joyce Pittman was a nurse practitioner and coordinator, Wound/Ostomy Department, Indiana University Health Academic Health Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, and is currently an associate professor, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama. Terrie Beeson is a clinical nurse specialist for surgical intensive care, and Jill Dillon is a clinical nurse specialist for surgical trauma intensive care, Indiana University Health Academic Health Center. Ziyi Yang is a biostatistician, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis. Janet Cuddigan is a professor, College of Nursing, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska. joyce.pittman@comcast.net.
Background:
Despite prevention strategies, hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) continue to occur, especially in critical care, raising the question whether some pressure injuries are unavoidable.
Objectives:
To determine the proportion of HAPIs among patients in critical and progressive care units that are unavoidable, and to identify risk factors that differentiate avoidable from unavoidable HAPIs.
Methods:
This study used a descriptive retrospective design. Data collected included demographic information, Braden Scale scores, clinical risk factors, and preventive interventions. The Pressure Ulcer Prevention Inventory was used to categorize HAPIs as avoidable or unavoidable.
Results:
A total of 165 patients participated in the study. Sixty-seven HAPIs (41%) were unavoidable. Participants who had congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR], 0.22; 95% CI, 0.06-0.76; P = .02), were chemically sedated (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.72; P = .003), had systolic blood pressure below 90 mm Hg (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27-0.99; P = .047), and received at least 1 vasopressor (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23-0.86; P = .01) were less likely to have an unavoidable HAPI. Those with bowel management devices were more likely to have an unavoidable HAPI (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.02-4.71; P = .04). When length of stay was incorporated into the regression model, for each 1-day increase in stay, the odds of an unavoidable pressure injury developing increased by 4% (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.002-1.08; P = .04). Participants who had a previous pressure injury were 5 times more likely to have an unavoidable HAPI (OR, 5.27; 95% CI, 1.20-23.15; P = .03).
Conclusions:
Unavoidable HAPIs do occur; moreover, when preventive interventions are not documented and implemented appropriately, avoidable HAPIs occur.
Related Concept Videos
04:32Murine Oropharyngeal Aspiration Model of Ventilator-associated and Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
06:51Mouse Model of Pressure Ulcers After Spinal Cord Injury
Hospitals-I
14:28Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care

