Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Measuring Engagement of Spectators of Social Digital Games
Published on: July 3, 2021
Utilizing Shared Expertise Across Contexts to Engage in Multi-institutional Interprofessional Scholarship
Anthony Breitbach1, Kelly Lockeman, Tina Gunaldo
1Athletic Training Program, Saint Louis University, 3437 Caroline Mall, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA. Tel 314-977-8561. anthony.breitbach@health.slu.edu.
Interprofessional education (IPE) research is advancing through a collaborative, multi-institutional approach. This study uses a quality improvement model to compare IPE learning experiences across different contexts and learner levels, informing best practices for health professional education.
Area of Science:
- Health Professions Education Research
- Interprofessional Collaboration
- Quality Improvement in Education
Background:
- Interprofessional education (IPE) research is expanding but often limited to single institutions and unique assessment tools.
- Comparing pedagogical approaches and assessments across diverse contexts and learner levels is crucial for preparing collaborative health professionals.
- Existing IPE initiatives commonly introduce foundational concepts of professional roles, communication, and collaboration, aligning with Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) competencies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To advance IPE research by fostering collaboration among multiple institutions.
- To improve the educational preparation of "collaborative-ready" health professionals.
- To inform best practices for introductory IPE learning experiences through multi-institutional research.
Main Methods:
- The IPE Research Collaborative (IPE-RC) united researchers from four universities delivering introductory IPE.
- Donabedian's quality improvement (QI) model was adapted to operationalize IPEC competencies within the collaborative research framework.
- A systematic, multi-institutional approach mirroring interprofessional practice was employed to study learning experiences.
Main Results:
- The study demonstrates a systematic approach for multi-institutional research on introductory IPE.
- The application of Donabedian's QI model provided a framework for assessing and improving IPE quality.
- The research facilitates comparison of pedagogical approaches and assessment tools across different contexts and learner levels.
Conclusions:
- Multi-institutional collaboration is essential for robust IPE research.
- A standardized framework, like the QI model, can enhance the comparability and rigor of IPE studies.
- This research provides insights into optimizing introductory IPE for collaborative, person-centered healthcare.
Related Concept Videos
Institutional Markets
Characteristics of Institutional Markets
Institutional markets are characterized by their size and purchasing power. Institutions often procure goods and...
Institutional Investors
Self Within Cultural Contexts
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
14:02Measuring Engagement of Spectators of Social Digital Games
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care