Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026
04:20
Sexual Selection and Mate Choice
48.1K
Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection
Katja R Kasimatis1, Peter L Ralph2,3, Patrick C Phillips2
1Institute of Ecology and Evolution and k.kasimatis@utoronto.ca.
G3 (Bethesda, Md.)
|September 19, 2019
Summary
Sexually antagonistic selection rarely causes significant autosomal genetic divergence between males and females. Strong selection is needed, leading to high genetic load, and sampling variance can mimic divergence.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary genetics
- Population genetics
- Sexual selection
Background:
- Autosomal genomes are shared between sexes, posing challenges for sex-specific fitness optima.
- Sexually antagonistic selection may favor different alleles in males and females.
- Random segregation homogenizes alleles, preventing accumulation of between-sex divergence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if sexually antagonistic selection can explain observed high male-female F statistics.
- To model the relationship between selection strength, genetic divergence, and genetic load.
Main Methods:
- Developed a population genetic model incorporating a single-locus model with nonrandom mate choice.
- Employed individual-based simulations for genome-wide selection analysis.
- Assessed the impact of sample size and sampling variance on divergence.
Main Results:
- Exceptionally strong selection is required to produce measurable autosomal divergence between sexes.
- Such strong selection results in a correspondingly high genetic load (decreased population fitness).
- Simulations showed that small sample sizes and sampling variance can generate substantial male-female divergence.
Conclusions:
- Sexually antagonistic selection alone is unlikely to be the primary driver of high autosomal F statistics.
- Interpreting autosomal allelic differentiation between sexes requires caution due to potential confounding factors.
- Sampling effects can easily create the appearance of significant genetic divergence.
Related Concept Videos
Sexual Selection and Mate Choice
48.1K
Choosing Mates
48.1K
Sexual Selection and Mate Choice
3.0K
Sexual Selection Class Simulation
ExpandNote: In this activity, you and your classmates will portray a sexually reproducing population consisting of an equal number of male and female animals. You will simulate several different mating scenarios to determine how relative quality, attractiveness, sex, and parental commitment affect mate choice and reproductive success. The goal of this activity is to maximize your progeny.
Hypotheses: There are several overall hypotheses for female and male...
ExpandNote: In this activity, you and your classmates will portray a sexually reproducing population consisting of an equal number of male and female animals. You will simulate several different mating scenarios to determine how relative quality, attractiveness, sex, and parental commitment affect mate choice and reproductive success. The goal of this activity is to maximize your progeny.
Hypotheses: There are several overall hypotheses for female and male...
3.0K
Sexual Selection and Mate Choice
2.4K
Determining Roles and Making Gamete Packages for Class
ExpandFirst determine the quantity of materials needed based on the class size. This activity can easily be scaled up or down. In Table 1, options are listed for 30, 20 or 10 students. Click Here to download Table 1 NOTE: You may easily create a custom number by following these simple guidelines.
ExpandFirst determine the quantity of materials needed based on the class size. This activity can easily be scaled up or down. In Table 1, options are listed for 30, 20 or 10 students. Click Here to download Table 1 NOTE: You may easily create a custom number by following these simple guidelines.
2.4K
Limits to Natural Selection
34.1K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
34.1K
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes
9.0K
While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.
9.0K
06:26Selective Capture of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine from Genomic DNA
12.3K
Described is a two-step labeling process using β-glucosyltransferase (β-GT) to transfer an azide-glucose to 5-hmC, followed by click chemistry to transfer a biotin linker for easy and density-independent enrichment. This efficient and specific labeling method enables enrichment of 5-hmC with extremely low background and high-throughput epigenomic mapping via next-generation...
12.3K