Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Dried Blood Spots - Preparing and Processing for Use in Immunoassays and in Molecular Techniques
Published on: March 13, 2015
Comparative evaluation of two immunoassays for serological diagnosis of hepatitis E
Antonio Sampedro1, Isabel Casanovas1, Julian Ceballos1
1Department of Microbiology, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Abstract:
Serological testing for immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies to Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is useful for diagnosing acute hepatitis E. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of chemiluminescence immunoassay (HEV IgM; Vircell, Granada, Spain) in comparison with a manual enzyme immunoassay (Anti-HEV virus; Wantai, Beijing, China) for anti-HEV IgM detection. Seventeen HEV-RNA positive and 69 HEV-RNA negative sera were tested by both assays. Virclia sensitivity was 94.1%, whereas that of the enzyme immunosorbent assay (EIA) was 76.5%; specificity was 98.5% and 97.1% for Virclia and EIA, respectively. Differences between both assays were not statistically significant. Virclia HEV IgM showed excellent performance and can be a good alternative to conventional enzyme immunoassays for the detection of IgM against HEV.

