Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

2.4K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
2.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How to Develop a Qualitative Evaluation Plan for a Complex National Intervention: Key Steps and Reflections from the RADx-UP Program.

Qualitative report (Online)·2026
Same author

Implementing measurable goals for diversity, equity, and inclusion in Clinical and Translational Science Awards leadership.

Equity in education & society·2026
Same author

Improving the equity landscape at U.S. academic institutions: 10 strategies to lead change.

Equity in education & society·2026
Same author

Pre‑partum blood leukocyte profiles distinguish gestational inflammatory stages that predict birth‑related adverse outcomes.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Community engagement contributions to rural health research: Researchers' experience with the Midwest Rural Health Research Community Advisory Board.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2026
Same author

Spectrum of Anti-Neurofascin Neuropathies: A Retrospective Indian Cohort.

Muscle & nerve·2025
Same journal

Flexible outlier detection in multicenter clinical trials.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2026
Same journal

Research on the road: Partnering with community emergency medical services to expand access to clinical trials.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2026
Same journal

Mapping the landscape of dissemination and implementation science across the CTSA consortium: A multi-domain environmental website scan.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2026
Same journal

Are you still engaged? Leveraging the LMS to support engagement in asynchronous courses.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2026
Same journal

Prediction of α-synuclein seed amplification assay positivity in remotely followed <i>LRRK2</i> G2019S carriers using a validated data-driven model.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2026
Same journal

Embracing complexity: An opportunity for developmental evaluation.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 4, 2026

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
07:31

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills

Published on: February 13, 2020

7.3K

Opportunities for strengthening CTSA evaluation.

Tanha Patel1, Julie Rainwater2, William M Trochim3

  • 1Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
|October 30, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program is improving its evaluation methods based on recommendations. Key areas for enhancement include collaborative infrastructure, data utilization, common metrics, and national-level program evaluation.

Keywords:
CTSANCATScommon metricsevaluationevaluation policytranslational science

More Related Videos

Adaptation of Semiautomated Circulating Tumor Cell CTC Assays for Clinical and Preclinical Research Applications
14:14

Adaptation of Semiautomated Circulating Tumor Cell CTC Assays for Clinical and Preclinical Research Applications

Published on: February 28, 2014

16.2K
A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents
06:15

A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents

Published on: July 10, 2017

13.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 4, 2026

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
07:31

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills

Published on: February 13, 2020

7.3K
Adaptation of Semiautomated Circulating Tumor Cell CTC Assays for Clinical and Preclinical Research Applications
14:14

Adaptation of Semiautomated Circulating Tumor Cell CTC Assays for Clinical and Preclinical Research Applications

Published on: February 28, 2014

16.2K
A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents
06:15

A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents

Published on: July 10, 2017

13.4K

Area of Science:

  • Translational science
  • Program evaluation
  • Health research infrastructure

Background:

  • The Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program aims to improve medical research.
  • Recommendations from a 2013 Institute of Medicine review and CTS Journal guidelines prompted a need for enhanced program evaluation.
  • Previous evaluations highlighted areas for improvement within the CTSA Program's structure and outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the progress of the CTSA Program's evaluation efforts in response to prior recommendations.
  • To identify and propose new strategies for strengthening the evaluation of the CTSA Program.
  • To foster dialogue among stakeholders regarding the future of CTSA Program evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • A 2018 national survey was administered to evaluators across all 64 CTSA hubs.
  • Content analysis was performed on CTSA Program Funding Opportunity Announcements to understand the role of evaluation.
  • Data from the survey and content analysis were used to document progress and identify opportunities.

Main Results:

  • Progress has been made in addressing evaluation-related recommendations from the 2013 review and guidelines.
  • Four key opportunities for strengthening CTSA evaluation were identified.
  • These opportunities focus on collaborative infrastructure, data utilization, common metrics, and national-level evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • Continued development of collaborative evaluation infrastructure at local and national levels is recommended.
  • Enhanced utilization of existing data is crucial for robust program assessment.
  • Strengthening common metrics and pursuing national-level evaluation opportunities will further advance the CTSA Program.