Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Pre-clinical Evaluation of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of Acute Leukemia
Published on: September 18, 2013
Understanding the Right to Try Act
Rajiv Agarwal1, Leonard B Saltz2
1Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Abstract:
Patients with cancer who have exhausted standard treatments often seek access to investigational drugs. Often, however, such access is unavailable, due to either the unavailability of a trial, lack of an open recruiting spot on the trial, even when the trial itself is open, or the inability of the patient to meet one or more trial eligibility criteria. In such settings patients often seek access to investigational agents outside of a trial. The federal "Right to Try" legislation was passed to create an additional avenue, different from the FDA's Expanded Access, or "Compassionate Use" Program, through which patients might obtain access to investigational drugs. A year after this legislation was signed into law, there remains both a limited awareness of it and a substantial degree of misunderstanding on the part of those who are aware of it. The law creates an avenue to greatly facilitate off-study administration when patient, physician, and the manufacturer are all in agreement regarding the off study use of an eligible investigational agent. The law does not, however, empower a patient to impose a demand on either a provider or a drug manufacturer, nor does it require any entity to provide financial coverage for the drug. Eligible drugs are those which are not approved by the FDA for any indication, have completed a phase I trial, have an ongoing pivotal trial, and have an active registration plan. We review the specific law with commentary on its implications for improved access to investigational drugs outside of clinical trials.
Insights
The Right to Try law offers a new pathway for patients with cancer to access investigational drugs when standard treatments fail. Awareness and understanding of this law remain limited, impacting patient access to novel therapies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Health Policy
Background:
- Patients with advanced cancer often exhaust standard treatments.
- Access to investigational drugs through clinical trials can be limited by trial availability and eligibility criteria.
- Patients frequently seek investigational agents outside of formal clinical trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the federal "Right to Try" legislation.
- To clarify the provisions and implications of the Right to Try law for accessing investigational drugs.
- To assess the current awareness and understanding of this legislation.
Main Methods:
- Review of the federal "Right to Try" legislation.
- Analysis of the law's framework for off-study investigational drug administration.
- Commentary on patient access to eligible investigational agents.
Main Results:
- The Right to Try law provides an alternative to the FDA's Expanded Access program.
- Limited awareness and significant misunderstanding of the law persist.
- The law facilitates off-study drug use when all parties (patient, physician, manufacturer) agree.
- It does not compel providers or manufacturers to supply drugs or cover costs.
Conclusions:
- Eligible investigational drugs must be unapproved, have completed Phase I, have an ongoing pivotal trial, and an active registration plan.
- The Right to Try law aims to improve access to investigational drugs outside of clinical trials.
- Further education is needed to ensure proper utilization of this legislation.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Drug Regulation
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Standards of Care II
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Standards of Care I

