Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI in patients with and without left ventricular hypertrophy: a DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI
Muhammad Sabbah1, Lars Nepper-Christensen, Jacob Lønborg
1Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Insights
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) does not affect the relationship between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and diameter stenosis in STEMI patients. Complete revascularization guided by FFR improves outcomes regardless of LVH presence.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Imaging
Background:
- Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is common in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.
- The correlation between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and diameter stenosis, and its clinical implications, may be affected by LVH.
- Optimal revascularization strategies in STEMI patients with LVH require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the correlation between FFR and diameter stenosis in STEMI patients with and without LVH.
- To assess the influence of LVH on the clinical outcomes of complete FFR-guided revascularization versus culprit-lesion-only revascularization.
Main Methods:
- Substudy of the DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI trial involving 279 STEMI patients.
- Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for LVH assessment.
- FFR evaluation and quantitative coronary analysis of non-culprit lesions in 96 patients.
Main Results:
- A significant correlation between diameter stenosis and FFR was observed in both groups (with and without LVH), with no significant difference between groups (p=0.38 for stenosis, p=0.34 for FFR).
- FFR-guided complete revascularization reduced the risk of death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization in both STEMI patients without LVH (HR 0.42) and with LVH (HR 0.50).
- No interaction was found between LVH and the benefit of complete revascularization (p=0.82).
Conclusions:
- LVH does not alter the correlation between diameter stenosis and FFR in STEMI patients.
- Complete FFR-guided revascularization improves clinical outcomes in STEMI patients, irrespective of LVH status.
- FFR remains a valuable tool for guiding revascularization decisions in STEMI patients with or without LVH.
Aims:
The aim of this substudy was to investigate the correlation between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and diameter stenosis in patients with STEMI with and without left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and the influence of LVH on complete FFR-guided revascularisation versus culprit only, in terms of risk of clinical outcome.
Methods And Results:
In this DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI substudy, 279 patients with STEMI had cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for assessment of left ventricular mass index. Ninety-six patients had FFR evaluation of a non-culprit lesion. Diameter stenosis of the non-culprit lesion was determined with two-dimensional quantitative coronary analysis. The diameter stenosis (56.9% vs 54.3%, p=0.38) and FFR value (0.83 vs 0.85, p=0.34) were significantly correlated in both groups (Spearman's ρ=-0.40 and -0.41 without LVH and with LVH, respectively; p<0.001) but were not different between patients without and with LVH (p for interaction=0.87). FFR-guided complete revascularisation was associated with reduced risk of death, myocardial infarction or ischaemia-driven revascularisation both for patients without LVH (HR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20-0.85) and for patients with LVH (HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.17-1.47), with no interaction between the FFR-guided complete revascularisation and LVH (p for interaction=0.82).
Conclusions:
LVH did not interact with the correlation between diameter stenosis and FFR and did not modify the impact of complete revascularisation on the occurrence of subsequent clinical events.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

