Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Comprehensive Evaluation of the Abdominal Aorta
Published on: September 8, 2023
The case for expanding abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.
Thomas F X O'Donnell1, Bruce E Landon2, Marc L Schermerhorn3
1Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass.
Current abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening guidelines for men aged 65-75 may need re-evaluation. Evolving endovascular repair techniques and changing AAA prevalence necessitate a review of screening strategies.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Preventive Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- Current abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening guidelines are primarily based on older trials predating the endovascular era.
- Existing screening targets are typically limited to male ever-smokers aged 65-75 and individuals with a family history of AAA.
- Advances in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and its safety profile, particularly in elderly populations, have altered the risk-benefit analysis of AAA repair and, consequently, screening.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically examine the existing evidence supporting current abdominal aortic aneurysm screening protocols.
- To evaluate the potential for expanding screening criteria for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
- To assess how changes in AAA prevalence and treatment options impact screening recommendations.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of evidence on AAA screening trials.
- Analysis of risk-benefit ratios for AAA repair in the context of endovascular techniques.
- Evaluation of current AAA prevalence data and trends.
- Assessment of guidelines from major health organizations like the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
Main Results:
- The efficacy and applicability of traditional AAA screening criteria are being questioned due to advancements in endovascular repair.
- Despite decreasing AAA prevalence, driven by improved medical therapies and reduced smoking rates, the risk-benefit of screening requires reassessment.
- The safety and wider use of EVAR, especially in older patients, influence the rationale for screening interventions.
Conclusions:
- Existing screening paradigms for abdominal aortic aneurysms require re-evaluation in light of modern endovascular repair techniques.
- Expanded screening strategies for AAA may be warranted, considering the evolving risk-benefit landscape.
- Further research is needed to define optimal screening criteria for abdominal aortic aneurysms in the current medical environment.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm I: Introduction
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

