Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Optimising Aortic Endovascular Repair in Patients with Marfan Syndrome
Quentin Pellenc1, Antoine Girault2, Arnaud Roussel2
1Vascular and Thoracic Surgery Department, Bichat Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France; Paris-Diderot University, Paris, France; Centre de Référence pour le Syndrome de Marfan et apparentés, Bichat Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 75018 Paris, France; INSERM U 1148, LVTS, Bichat Hospital, 75018 Paris, France.
Objective:
In Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients, endovascular repair carries a risk of aortic wall injury, which may result in retrograde aortic dissection, dilatation, or false aneurysm at the landing zones. It was hypothesised that potentially these complications may be avoided using modified practices. This study aimed to describe experience of a specific protocol for endovascular aortic repair in patients with MFS.
Methods:
All MFS patients treated by aortic endovascular repair between February 2015 and August 2018 were included prospectively. The following rules were applied: (i) excluding stent grafts with bare stents and barbs, (ii) proximal landing in a pre-existing graft, or (iii) minimising proximal oversizing when landing in the proximal native aorta (<10%), and (iv) distal undersizing for chronic dissection cases.
Results:
In eighteen patients (55% men, mean age: 47 ± 17 years), the index procedures were initial endovascular aortic repair (n = 10), elephant trunk completion (n = 6), and anastomotic pseudo-aneurysm after thoracic open repair (n = 2). The technical success rate was 100%. Proximal landing was in the native aorta in 11 patients (61%), with a mean proximal oversizing of 2.4 mm (8% oversized). Distal landing in the native aorta was performed in 16 cases (89%), with a mean distal undersizing of 8.9 mm (- 23%). No mortality, spinal cord ischaemia, stroke, or retrograde aortic dissection occurred post-operatively. One type 1b endoleak was observed. The mean follow up was 21.4 months. Aortic aneurysm related mortality was 5% (n = 1) and occurred after distal thoraco-abdominal surgery planned from the outset (prior to endovascular repair). Another patient presented a proximal landing zone complication with aortic enlargement. The mean maximum aortic diameter decreased significantly from 59 mm to 45 mm (p = .0005) after treatment.
Conclusion:
The specific protocol described in this study seems to optimise the results of endovascular aortic repair in MFS patients with significant aortic remodelling.
Insights
This study presents a modified protocol for endovascular aortic repair in Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients, significantly reducing complications and improving aortic diameter. The protocol optimizes outcomes for MFS patients undergoing aortic repair.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
- Genetics and Hereditary Diseases
Background:
- Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) face risks of aortic wall injury, dissection, dilatation, and false aneurysms at landing zones.
- Modified practices may mitigate these EVAR-related complications in MFS patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the experience and outcomes of a specific protocol for EVAR in patients with MFS.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of modified EVAR techniques in Marfan syndrome.
Main Methods:
- Prospective inclusion of MFS patients treated with EVAR between February 2015 and August 2018.
- Application of a protocol excluding stent grafts with bare stents/barbs, utilizing proximal landing in pre-existing grafts or minimizing oversizing (<10%), and distal undersizing for chronic dissections.
Main Results:
- Technical success rate was 100% in 18 MFS patients.
- No mortality, spinal cord ischemia, stroke, or retrograde aortic dissection occurred post-operatively.
- Significant reduction in mean maximum aortic diameter from 59 mm to 45 mm (p=0.0005) with a mean follow-up of 21.4 months.
Conclusions:
- A specific EVAR protocol appears to optimize results in Marfan syndrome patients.
- The described protocol facilitates significant aortic remodeling and reduces complication risks.
- This approach enhances the safety and effectiveness of EVAR for MFS patients.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

