Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Author Spotlight: Integrating Alveolar-Capillary Reserve Measurements in Exercise Adaptation and Therapeutic Strategies
Published on: February 2, 2024
Exercise capacity and ventilation inhomogeneity in cystic fibrosis: A cross-sectional study
Simone Gambazza1,2,3, Riccardo Guarise1, Federica Carta1,3
1Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Milan, Italy.
Background:
Lung clearance index (LCI2.5 ) is a marker of overall lung ventilation inhomogeneity and has proven to be able to detect early peripheral damage in subjects with cystic fibrosis (CF), with greater sensitivity than conventional spirometry. Combining its sensitivity with the output of an incremental exercise testing, we hypothesized that any sign of ventilation inhomogeneity in subjects without severe airflow obstruction and with a normal exercise tolerance could be relevant for the CF team, tracking early lung disease and potential exercise limiting factors.
Methods:
Patients with CF in clinical stable conditions were recruited between 2015 and 2017. Available spirometry, nitrogen multiple-breath washout test and symptoms-limited exercise testing performed as parts of patients' annual routine evaluation were considered for this cross-sectional study. To describe the relationship between exercise intensity and ventilation inhomogeneity, a linear regression analysis was performed using backward elimination based on Akaike information criteria.
Results:
Seventy-seven patients (38 females) were included. Sacin and LCI2.5 were significantly higher in patients with an overall reduced exercise tolerance. Peak work developed during exercise was associated with body mass index (b = 5.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.53-8.98), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1 ; b = 3.71; 95% CI = 1.96-5.46), Pseudomonas aeruginosa chronic infection (b = -8.84; 95% CI = -15.84 to -1.84) but not with LCI2.5 .
Conclusion:
Exercise capacity and airflow obstruction are associated in this Italian CF cohort. Considering the greater discriminatory power of LCI2.5 over FEV1 and peak work, the Godfrey protocol without gas analysis cannot provide detailed information about lung function or efficiency. However, this incremental protocol without gas exchange measures can still provide the CF team with information about exercise tolerance and disability.
More Related Videos
07:09Assessment of Pulmonary Capillary Blood Volume, Membrane Diffusing Capacity, and Intrapulmonary Arteriovenous Anastomoses During Exercise
Published on: February 20, 2017
08:25Combining Volumetric Capnography And Barometric Plethysmography To Measure The Lung Structure-function Relationship
Published on: January 8, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation
Alveolar Surface Tension
The alveolar fluid lines the luminal surface of the alveoli and exerts a force called surface tension. This force is caused by the polar water molecules in the liquid being more strongly attracted to each...
Respiratory Volumes and Capacities I
Respiratory Capacities
One key metric is the Inspiratory Capacity (IC), which represents the maximum amount of air that can be inhaled with full effort. IC is calculated by summing the tidal volume and inspiratory reserve volume, typically ranging from 2.4 to 3.6 liters.
The Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) represents the air in the...
Respiratory Volumes and Capacities
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
External and Internal Respiration