Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
A re-examination of the acquittal biasing effect of offence seriousness
Samantha Lundrigan1, Mandeep K Dhami2, Katrin Mueller-Johnson3
1Policing Institute for the Eastern Region, Faculty of Arts, Law and Social Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK.
Abstract:
The justice system should operate free of bias, and jurors' judgements of a defendant's guilt should be based on evidential factors alone. However, research suggests that this is not always the case. The aim of this study is to investigate the biasing effect of offence seriousness - a case-related, extralegal factor - on juror decision-making. An experiment was conducted to examine the effect of this extralegal factor on 118 members of the jury-eligible public's interpretations of 'beyond reasonable doubt' (BRD), probability of commission, verdict and confidence in verdict. It was found that defendants charged with more serious offences were judged to be less likely to have committed the crime. However, offence seriousness was not found to have a significant effect on interpretations of BRD and verdict. The present findings suggest a need to instruct jurors on the application of legal (probative) factors alone.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
Halo Effect
Correspondence Bias
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
Fundamental Attribution Error

