Use of a plasma test for verifying epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutations in fluid samples from
Wataru Ogura1, Kouki Ohtsuka2, Masachika Fujiwara3
1Department of Clinical Laboratory, Kyorin University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract:
Because epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are effective in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations, it is critical to obtain accurate EGFR mutation test results. For NSCLC patients, EGFR mutation testing is performed using the commercial Cobas EGFR Mutation test v2.0, which can be used to analyze both formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue (FFPE test, or FT) and plasma samples (plasma test, or PT). Since primary tumor tissues are often unavailable from relapsed patients, fluid samples are often used for EGFR mutation testing, but they are often tested using the FT. Here, we report three cases in which EGFR mutations were detected using the FT with FFPE primary tumor tissue samples, but were not detected using fluid samples (two pleural effusion and one cerebrospinal fluid sample). Because the FT may not be capable of detecting EGFR mutations in fluid samples, we used the PT, which is more sensitive, to verify the presence of EGFR mutations using the same fluid samples. As expected, the PT detected the same EGFR mutations in fluid samples as the FT did in FFPE primary tumor tissue samples.
Insights
Accurate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing is crucial for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. The plasma test (PT) is more sensitive than the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue test (FT) for detecting EGFR mutations in fluid samples from relapsed patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Diagnostics
- Genetics
Background:
- Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are vital for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with specific EGFR mutations.
- Accurate EGFR mutation testing is essential for effective NSCLC treatment selection.
Observation:
- The commercial Cobas EGFR Mutation test v2.0 can analyze both formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue (FT) and plasma samples (PT).
- In three cases, EGFR mutations were detected in FFPE primary tumor tissue using FT but not in fluid samples (pleural effusion, cerebrospinal fluid).
- Fluid samples are often used for EGFR mutation testing in relapsed patients when primary tumor tissue is unavailable.
Findings:
- The formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue test (FT) may have limitations in detecting EGFR mutations in fluid samples.
- The plasma test (PT) demonstrated higher sensitivity and successfully detected the same EGFR mutations in fluid samples that were previously identified in FFPE tissue.
- The plasma test (PT) confirmed the presence of EGFR mutations in fluid samples, aligning with results from FFPE tissue testing.
Implications:
- The plasma test (PT) offers a more sensitive method for EGFR mutation detection in fluid samples, particularly for relapsed NSCLC patients.
- Utilizing the more sensitive plasma test (PT) can improve diagnostic accuracy when primary tumor tissue is unavailable.
- These findings highlight the importance of selecting the appropriate EGFR mutation testing method based on sample type to ensure accurate patient stratification for targeted therapy.
More Related Videos
08:28Validated Immunochemical Assay for Comprehensive Determination of the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Released from and Bound to Cells
Published on: May 9, 2025
08:49Exosomal miRNA Analysis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer NSCLC Patients' Plasma Through qPCR: A Feasible Liquid Biopsy Tool
Published on: May 27, 2016
