Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.2K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.2K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.6K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.6K
Effects of feedback01:24

Effects of feedback

904
Feedback in control systems plays a critical role in shaping various operational parameters, extending beyond simple error reduction to influence stability, bandwidth, gain, impedance, and sensitivity. Understanding these effects requires examining a basic feedback system characterized by defined input, output, error, and feedback signals.
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
904
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

9.2K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
9.2K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

323
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
323
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A closer look at students' knowledge of effective learning strategies, where they learn about them, and why they do not use them.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2025
Same author

The relationship between visuospatial and analogical reasoning.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Acquiring complex concepts through classification versus observation.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2024
Same author

Subjective Understanding is Reduced by Mechanistic Framing.

Journal of cognition·2024
Same author

The effects of explicit reasoning on moral judgements.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2023
Same author

The effects of testing the relationships among relational concepts.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2022
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Cross-Phoneme Generalisation of Dimension-Based Statistical Learning for Stop Voicing: Probing Subject Design and Word Frame Effects.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.1K

Facilitating transfer through incorrect examples and explanatory feedback.

Daniel Corral1, Shana K Carpenter1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|February 12, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Learning from incorrect examples enhances understanding. Studying both correct and incorrect examples, especially with explanatory feedback, improved performance on classification and application questions about experimental design.

Keywords:
Correct and incorrect examplescomplex concept learningcomprehensionexplanatory feedbacktransfer

More Related Videos

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

5.8K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.1K
Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

5.8K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Educational Psychology

Background:

  • Behaviorism suggests learning is optimal from correct examples.
  • Incorrect examples may highlight missing conceptual properties, aiding learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate differential learning outcomes from studying correct versus incorrect examples.
  • To compare the effectiveness of explanatory versus corrective feedback.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using hypothetical study scenarios to determine if they represented true experiments.
  • Participants were exposed to correct examples only, incorrect examples only, or a mix of both, with varying feedback conditions (explanatory, corrective, none).
  • Performance was assessed via classification and application questions on novel scenarios.

Main Results:

  • Mixed example conditions with feedback yielded the best classification performance.
  • Incorrect and mixed example conditions, particularly with explanatory feedback, led to superior performance on application questions.
  • Learning from incorrect examples was supported, especially when feedback was provided.

Conclusions:

  • A mixed approach to studying examples, incorporating incorrect instances, can enhance learning.
  • Explanatory feedback is crucial for maximizing the benefits of learning from incorrect examples, especially for application-based tasks.
  • Findings provide insights into the cognitive mechanisms of learning from errors.