Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy Professionals' Perceptions of Conducting Research
Purpose:
To evaluate medical imaging and radiation therapy professionals' perceptions of conducting research.
Methods:
Using a descriptive survey approach, a random sample of 10 000 American Society of Radiologic Technologists (ASRT) members was invited to share their experiences with conducting research, including challenges, reasons for not engaging in research, potential motivators, and support measures that would enhance their ability to conduct research in the medical imaging and radiation therapy profession. Three hundred ninety completed responses were analyzed for this study.
Results:
The majority (284, 72.8%) of the participants had no knowledge of or were slightly knowledgeable of the research process, and more than 75% of the participants did not feel prepared or felt they were only slightly prepared to conduct research. However, 257 (65.9%) of the participants believed it was very important to conduct research to advance the medical imaging and radiation therapy profession. Eighty-eight participants who indicated that they had conducted research named collecting data (34, 38.6%) and analyzing the results (20, 22.7%) as their greatest barriers. Participants who had not conducted research (302, 77.4%) said that the main reason was because it was not required in their current position (193, 63.9%). More than half of participants indicated that having time allocated to conduct research, conducting research with an experienced individual, collaborating with a research mentor, and attending continuing education were support measures that might enable them to conduct research.
Discussion:
It is essential that medical imaging and radiation therapy professionals be aware of the importance of conducting research and participating in scholarly activities so that the profession can advance as a distinct allied health discipline. Opportunities to increase or improve research endeavors in the profession include encouraging professionals to publish and present their research results, allocating time and resources to conduct research, and providing research mentorships.
Conclusion:
Increasing or improving the research being conducted among medical imaging technologists and radiation therapists and making such endeavors a priority can advance the profession and lead to better service to patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
X-ray Imaging
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging


