Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Uncertainty-Aware Vision-Language Learning Improves Chest X-Ray Retrieval.

IEEE pulse·2026
Same author

Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived chimeric antigen receptor-macrophages eradicate IL-13Rα2-positive solid tumors.

The Journal of pathology·2026
Same author

Acute PGAD-Like Genital Arousal in a 59-Year-Old Woman After Duloxetine Withdrawal: A 36-Month Follow-Up Case Report.

Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental·2026
Same author

Enhancing Estimation of Fine Particulate Matter Chemical Composition across North America by Including Geophysical <i>A Priori</i> Information in Deep Learning with Uncertainty Quantification.

ACS ES&T air·2026
Same author

Multi-Scale Self-Supervised Consistency Training for Trustworthy Medical Imaging Classification.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

TMEM35B as a novel biomarker for diagnosing gliomas.

Biomarkers in medicine·2024
Same journal

Comment on "Validation of a Single-Item Screener for Financial Toxicity in Outpatient Imaging Patients".

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Comparison of supplemental breast cancer screening outcomes for automated versus hand-held ultrasound.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Screening Mammography Completion Among Women Enrolled in a Lung Cancer Screening Program.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Hantavirus Infection Beyond the Lung: A Multi-Organ Radiological Perspective on Diagnosis, Imaging Modalities, and Precautionary Measures for Radiology Departments.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Myelopathy: 2026 Update.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Knee Pain: Update 2026.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
04:48

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

Published on: November 30, 2022

3.3K

Inconsistent Performance of Deep Learning Models on Mammogram Classification.

Xiaoqin Wang1, Gongbo Liang2, Yu Zhang2

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
|February 19, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deep learning models show inconsistent performance on mammograms across different datasets. High performance on one dataset does not guarantee generalization to new, unseen data, requiring further validation for clinical use.

Keywords:
Deep learningmammogramperformance inconsistency

More Related Videos

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.5K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
04:48

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

Published on: November 30, 2022

3.3K
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.5K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging
  • Deep Learning for Mammography Analysis
  • Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Deep learning models achieve high performance in mammogram image classification, sometimes surpassing radiologists.
  • Concerns exist regarding the consistency and generalization capabilities of these models on external, unseen data.
  • Assessing transferability of deep learning performance across diverse mammogram datasets is crucial for clinical adoption.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance consistency of deep learning models on external mammogram datasets.
  • To determine if high performance on a training dataset transfers to data with different distributions.
  • To assess the generalizability of deep learning models in mammography.

Main Methods:

  • Six deep learning models (three published, three novel) were evaluated.
  • Models were trained/validated on Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM) or combined datasets.
  • Performance was tested on three external datasets (INbreast, MIAS, UKy) using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (auROC).

Main Results:

  • Published models achieved high auROC (0.88-0.95) on validation data.
  • Novel models achieved moderate auROC (0.71-0.79) on validation data.
  • All models showed significantly decreased performance on external test datasets (auROC 0.44-0.65).

Conclusions:

  • Deep learning model performance on mammograms is inconsistent across datasets.
  • High performance on one dataset does not readily transfer to unseen external data.
  • Models require further rigorous assessment and validation before clinical implementation.