Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
Toward Creating Equity in Awards Received During Medical School: Strategic Changes at One Institution
Arianne Teherani1, Elizabeth Harleman, Karen E Hauer
1A. Teherani is professor, Department of Medicine, education scientist, Center for Faculty Educators, and director of program evaluation, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2936-9832. E. Harleman is professor, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California. K.E. Hauer is professor, Department of Medicine, and associate dean for competency assessment and professional standards, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8812-4045. C. Lucey is professor of medicine, executive dean, and vice dean for education, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Implementing a holistic review process for Alpha Omega Alpha (AΩA) selection at UCSF School of Medicine increased equity for underrepresented in medicine (UIM) students. This approach balanced academic achievement with professional contributions, improving representation in medical honor societies.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Health Equity
- Medical Honor Societies
Background:
- Membership in Alpha Omega Alpha (AΩA) is prestigious but historically favors students not underrepresented in medicine (not-UIM).
- Previous selection methods at UCSF School of Medicine prioritized academic metrics, potentially creating bias.
- A need existed to address inequities in AΩA selection to ensure broader representation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the implementation of a holistic AΩA selection process at UCSF School of Medicine.
- To evaluate the impact of this holistic process on the selection of underrepresented in medicine (UIM) students.
- To assess changes in AΩA eligibility and selection rates between metric-driven and holistic review periods.
Main Methods:
- Transitioned from a clerkship metric-driven selection to a holistic review process for AΩA, starting with the class of 2017.
- Implemented changes including diverse selection committees, revised criteria, bias mitigation training, and blinded application review.
- Compared AΩA eligibility and selection outcomes for classes from 2014-2016 (metric-driven) versus 2017-2019 (holistic).
Main Results:
- During metric-driven selection, not-UIM students were significantly more likely to be eligible (4x) and selected (3x) for AΩA.
- Following holistic selection, not-UIM students remained more likely to be eligible (2x), but selection rates between UIM and not-UIM students became equitable (OR=.7, P=.12).
- The holistic process successfully created equity in UIM student representation among selected AΩA members.
Conclusions:
- A holistic selection process effectively addressed inequities in AΩA membership, promoting greater representation for UIM students.
- This approach, grounded in equity pedagogy, demonstrates a viable strategy for fair selection in medical honor societies.
- The findings have broader implications for creating equitable award selection processes within medical education.
Related Concept Videos
Equity Theory
Ethical Dilemmas II
Tertiary Healthcare System
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:

