Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Prospect theory and tax evasion: a reconsideration of the Yitzhaki puzzle
Amedeo Piolatto1, Matthew D Rablen2
11Barcelona Economics Institute (IEB), University of Barcelona, c/ J. M. Keynes, 1-11, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract:
The standard expected utility (EUT) model of tax evasion predicts that evasion is decreasing in the marginal tax rate (the Yitzhaki puzzle). Recent literature shows cases in which incorporating prospect theory (PT) does and does not overturn the Puzzle. In a general environment that nests both PT and EUT preferences, we provide a detailed study of how the elements of PT affect the Puzzle. PT does not always reverse the Puzzle, hence we give and interpret conditions for when it does and does not. When allowing for stigma and/or variable audit probability, PT reverses the Puzzle in the same way and with the same limitations as does EUT, if equally augmented.
Related Concept Videos
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Hindsight Biases
Social Loafing
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Confirmation Biases
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...

