Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genetic Screens02:46

Genetic Screens

5.5K
Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing  genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
5.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Transfer learning in robotics: From promises to practice through the emerging role of foundation models.

Science robotics·2026
Same author

FOXM1-Specific TCR-Engineered T Cells Target Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Cancer immunology research·2026
Same author

MoleQCage: Geometric High-Throughput Screening for Molecular Caging Prediction.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2024
Same author

RankMHC: Learning to Rank Class-I Peptide-MHC Structural Models.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2024
Same author

APE-Gen2.0: Expanding Rapid Class I Peptide-Major Histocompatibility Complex Modeling to Post-Translational Modifications and Noncanonical Peptide Geometries.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2024
Same author

EnGens: a computational framework for generation and analysis of representative protein conformational ensembles.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2023
Same journal

Correction to "AstraMEV (AI-Guided Structural Assembly of Multi-Epitope Vaccines) Against Infectious Bronchitis Virus".

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

MolPy: A Large Language Model-Friendly Toolkit for Reactive Topology Editing in Polymer Simulations.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Molecular Mechanisms of KIT Receptor Dimerization and Oncogenic Activation Revealed by Multiscale Simulations.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Structural and Thermodynamic Discrimination between Agonists and Antagonists of Retinoic Acid Receptor γ and the Vitamin D Receptor.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

PACEff Builder: An Efficient Platform for Constructing PACE Hybrid-Resolution Models for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Aqueous Protein, Peptide Assembly, and Membrane Protein Systems.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

TransKla: A Local-Global Cross-Attention Based Transformer Approach for Prediction of Lysine Lactylation Sites.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.5K

A Robotics-Inspired Screening Algorithm for Molecular Caging Prediction.

Oleksandr Kravchenko1, Anastasiia Varava2, Florian T Pokorny2

  • 1Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biology and Health (CBH), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 11428 Stockholm, Sweden.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|March 5, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a computational method to predict molecular caging complexes, where one molecule encapsulates another. This approach aids in discovering new complexes for applications like drug delivery and materials science.

More Related Videos

Covalent Fragment Screening Using the Quantitative Irreversible Tethering Assay
06:17

Covalent Fragment Screening Using the Quantitative Irreversible Tethering Assay

Published on: February 28, 2025

1.0K
Strategic Screening and Characterization of the Visual GPCR-mini-G Protein Signaling Complex for Successful Crystallization
09:19

Strategic Screening and Characterization of the Visual GPCR-mini-G Protein Signaling Complex for Successful Crystallization

Published on: March 16, 2020

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.5K
Covalent Fragment Screening Using the Quantitative Irreversible Tethering Assay
06:17

Covalent Fragment Screening Using the Quantitative Irreversible Tethering Assay

Published on: February 28, 2025

1.0K
Strategic Screening and Characterization of the Visual GPCR-mini-G Protein Signaling Complex for Successful Crystallization
09:19

Strategic Screening and Characterization of the Visual GPCR-mini-G Protein Signaling Complex for Successful Crystallization

Published on: March 16, 2020

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Molecular modeling
  • Supramolecular chemistry

Background:

  • Designing molecular caging complexes is challenging due to complex molecular shapes.
  • Predicting encapsulation requires advanced computational methods.
  • Existing methods may not be efficient for large-scale screening.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an efficient computational screening method for predicting molecular caging complexes.
  • To validate the method against previously studied molecular caging systems.
  • To enable large-scale computational discovery of novel caging complexes.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a caging verification algorithm adapted from robotic manipulation.
  • Tested the algorithm on three known molecular caging complex pairs.
  • Performed a screening experiment on a dataset of 46 hosts and 4 guests.

Main Results:

  • The algorithm's predictions were consistent with prior experimental findings for known complexes.
  • The method successfully predicted potential caging complexes within the screened dataset.
  • Demonstrated computational efficiency suitable for integration into screening pipelines.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed computational screening method is effective for identifying molecular caging complexes.
  • This approach can accelerate the discovery of new caging complexes for various applications.
  • The method offers a valuable tool to complement experimental techniques in molecular design.