Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Establishing a Practical and Cost-Effective Protocol for Corneal Sensitivity Testing in Clinical Settings
Published on: August 2, 2024
The Relationship Between Corvis ST Tonometry Parameters and Ocular Response Analyzer Corneal Hysteresis
Takashi Fujishiro1, Masato Matsuura1, Yuri Fujino1
1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo.
Corvis ST Tonometry (CST) measurements show weak to moderate correlations with Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) corneal hysteresis (CH) in glaucoma patients. This suggests CST offers complementary, not interchangeable, structural insights for CH assessment.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Optometry
Background:
- Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) provides corneal hysteresis (CH) based on air-jet pressure response.
- Corvis ST Tonometry (CST) offers detailed corneal structural visualization.
- Understanding the relationship between structural and dynamic corneal properties is crucial for glaucoma assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between Corvis ST Tonometry (CST) measurements and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) measured corneal hysteresis (CH).
- To determine if CST parameters can predict or correlate with CH values obtained from ORA.
Main Methods:
- Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (CST) and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) measurements were performed on 104 primary open-angle glaucoma eyes and 35 normative eyes.
- Additional measurements included axial length, corneal curvature, central corneal thickness (CCT), and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
- Linear regression analysis, guided by the bias-corrected Akaike Information Criterion, was used to assess associations between CST and ORA parameters.
Main Results:
- Several CST parameters, including deformation amplitude ratio (R=-0.51), corneal stiffness (SP A1, R=0.41), and inverse radius (R=-0.44), showed significant correlations with CH (P <0.05).
- An optimal predictive model for CH using CST parameters (applanation times, highest concavity deformation amplitude) and CCT yielded a correlation of R=0.67 (P<0.001).
- These correlations were characterized as weak to moderate, indicating distinct but related information from both devices.
Conclusions:
- Corvis ST Tonometry (CST) parameters are significantly, yet weakly to moderately, associated with Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) measured corneal hysteresis (CH).
- CST provides valuable structural information that complements ORA's dynamic measurements for a more comprehensive corneal assessment.
- The findings highlight the potential of integrating CST data for a nuanced understanding of corneal biomechanics in glaucoma.
More Related Videos
09:28Author Spotlight: An Accurate and Quantitative Approach to Study Visual Feature Selectivity of the Optokinetic Reflex in Mice
Published on: June 23, 2023
05:14Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025