Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cartesian Vector Notation01:28

Cartesian Vector Notation

1.3K
Cartesian vector notation is a valuable tool in mechanical engineering for representing vectors in three-dimensional space, performing vector operations such as determining the gradient, divergence, and curl, and expressing physical quantities such as the displacement, velocity, acceleration, and force. By using Cartesian vector notation, engineers can more easily analyze and solve problems in various areas of mechanical engineering, including dynamics, kinematics, and fluid mechanics. This...
1.3K
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

1.7K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
1.7K
Vector Algebra: Graphical Method01:10

Vector Algebra: Graphical Method

16.5K
Vectors can be multiplied by scalars, added to other vectors, or subtracted from other vectors. The vector sum of two (or more) vectors is called the resultant vector or, for short, the resultant.
We use the laws of geometry to construct resultant vectors, followed by trigonometry to find vector magnitudes and directions. For a geometric construction of the sum of two vectors in a plane, we follow the parallelogram rule. Suppose two vectors are at arbitrary positions. Translate either one of...
16.5K
Cartesian Form for Vector Formulation01:26

Cartesian Form for Vector Formulation

1.0K
The Cartesian form for vector formulation is a process to calculateĀ  the moment of force using the position and force vectors. The moment of force is defined as the cross-product of these vectors, making it a vector quantity. The Cartesian form of the position and force vectors involves unit vectors, which can be used to express the cross-product in determinant form.
1.0K
Coordinate Plane01:21

Coordinate Plane

165
The Cartesian coordinate plane is a fundamental structure in mathematics that enables the visualization of relationships between numerical values in two dimensions. It is formed by two intersecting number lines: a horizontal x-axis and a vertical y-axis. These axes meet at the origin, the point where both values are zero. Their intersection divides the plane into four quadrants labeled in a counterclockwise direction starting from the upper right.An ordered pair of numbers represents every...
165
Graphical Representation of Inequalities01:28

Graphical Representation of Inequalities

120
The graph of the equation where y equals x squared forms a curve known as a parabola. This curve acts as a boundary in the coordinate plane, dividing it into distinct regions based on the relative position of points.When the equality sign in the equation is replaced with an inequality—such as greater than, less than, greater than or equal to, or less than or equal to—the graphical representation changes from a single curve into a broader shaded area that signifies the set of all...
120

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Movement Sonification Types and Triggers: A Systematic Review.

Perceptual and motor skillsĀ·2026
Same author

Always Getting Lost: Defining Developmental Topographical Disorientation (DTD)-A Systematic Literature Review.

Neuropsychology reviewĀ·2025
Same author

A case of developmental topographical disorientation: impact on diagnostic trajectory and everyday life.

NeurocaseĀ·2025
Same author

Going Round in Circles: A Cognitive Bias in Geometric Reasoning.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive scienceĀ·2024
Same author

A clinical guide to assessment of navigation impairment: Standardized subjective and objective instruments and normative data.

Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychologyĀ·2022
Same author

Infant walking experience is related to the development of selective attention.

Journal of experimental child psychologyĀ·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 26, 2025

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.3K

Cognitive processing of spatial relations in Euclidean diagrams.

Yacin Hamami1, Milan N A van der Kuil2, John Mumma3

  • 1Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Acta Psychologica
|March 8, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study explored how people process spatial relationships in geometric diagrams, finding that judgments of exactness in diagrams become less consistent as they deviate from the precise geometric form. These findings offer insights into cognitive geometry and Euclidean practice.

Keywords:
Coordinate and categorical relationsEuclidean diagramsExact and co-exact relationsMetric and topological relationsSpatial relation processing

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects
06:36

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.3K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 26, 2025

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.3K
Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects
06:36

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.3K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Philosophy of Mathematics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • The cognitive processing of spatial relations is fundamental to understanding Euclidean geometry.
  • Manders' epistemological analysis introduced key dichotomies: metric vs. topological and exact vs. co-exact spatial relations.
  • Investigating these dichotomies offers insight into geometric reasoning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically investigate the cognitive processing of spatial relations in Euclidean diagrams.
  • To examine the hemispheric specialization in processing metric versus topological relations.
  • To analyze performance patterns in judging exact versus co-exact spatial relations.

Main Methods:

  • A two-part experiment using a visual half-field task design.
  • Participants judged spatial relations in Euclidean diagrams.
  • Analysis of hemispheric differences and agreement levels for different relation types.

Main Results:

  • Hemispheric differences were limited when processing metric versus topological relations, suggesting complex cognitive mechanisms.
  • Agreement in judging co-exact relations decreased as stimuli moved further from the exact case.
  • This pattern held across five tested pairs of exact/co-exact relations.

Conclusions:

  • Cognitive processing of spatial relations in diagrams is nuanced and may not strictly follow simple hemispheric specialization for metric/topological distinctions.
  • The decreasing agreement for co-exact relations highlights the cognitive sensitivity to deviations from exact geometric properties.
  • Findings have implications for understanding the epistemological foundations of diagram-based geometric practice.