Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025
05:15
The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
Published on: February 19, 2018
10.8K
Going Round in Circles: A Cognitive Bias in Geometric Reasoning
Yacin Hamami1,2,3, Marie Amalric4,5
1Department of Philosophy, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Open Mind : Discoveries in Cognitive Science
|December 10, 2024
Summary
Cognitive biases affect even educated adults, who systematically misjudge geometric reasoning. This study reveals how specific mental representations and reliance on translation over scaling lead to errors in deductive reasoning.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Mathematical Cognition
- Human Reasoning
Background:
- Deductive reasoning is vital for science and education.
- Its cognitive underpinnings, especially in geometry, are understudied.
- Existing theories of deductive reasoning may not fully capture human biases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and explain a cognitive bias in geometric deductive reasoning.
- To challenge current models of human deductive reasoning.
- To investigate the cognitive mechanisms behind geometric deduction.
Main Methods:
- Conducted two experiments with nearly 250 educated adult participants.
- Presented participants with elementary invalid inferences in Euclidean geometry.
- Designed two further experiments to test hypotheses about representational strategies.
Main Results:
- Educated adults systematically judged invalid geometric inferences as valid.
- Participants' errors stemmed from specific representations of geometric premises.
- A bias towards translating rather than scaling circles was observed.
Conclusions:
- Mathematical reasoning, considered rational, is susceptible to cognitive biases.
- Specific representational strategies and reliance on translation contribute to errors in geometric deduction.
- Findings offer insights into the cognitive roots of intuitive mathematical reasoning.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:25The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
02:13The Representativeness Heuristic
15.8K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
15.8K
01:22Bias
3.7K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
3.7K
01:16Deductive Reasoning
55.0K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
55.0K
00:59Inductive Reasoning
60.1K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.1K
01:08The Availability Heuristic
5.9K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
5.9K