Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Psychosocial functioning in the balance between autism and psychosis: evidence from three populations.

Molecular psychiatry·2022
Same author

Sources of Cognitive Conflict and Their Relevance to Theory-of-Mind Proficiency in Healthy Aging: A Preregistered Study.

Psychological science·2021
Same author

Alexithymia Is a Key Mediator of the Relationship Between Magical Thinking and Empathy.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2021
Same author

Predictors of performance on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test.

PloS one·2020
Same author

Re-imaging the intentional stance.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2020
Same author

Task load modulates tDCS effects on language performance.

Journal of neuroscience research·2019
Same journal

Higher- and lower-level processing in strategic reading: Reconceptualising the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS).

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

More caution or more lenient: deciphering the role of negative affect in recognition and inference.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

Cognitive offloading, critical thinking and attitudes towards artificial intelligence in the era of ChatGPT: a comparative study of artificial intelligence-assisted and manual task performance in young adults.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

Emojis vs. black-and-white and colored drawings: comparing living and non-living things in oral naming.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

The impact of facial expressions on space- and object-based attention by gaze cues.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

Feature interaction in metaphor aptness: the impact of topic-and-vehicle applicable features and semantic distances.

Cognitive processing·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS of Wernicke's and Broca's Areas in Studies of Language Learning and Word Acquisition
12:49

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS of Wernicke's and Broca's Areas in Studies of Language Learning and Word Acquisition

Published on: July 13, 2019

17.8K

Task load modulates tDCS effects on brain network for phonological processing.

Lílian Rodrigues de Almeida1, Paul A Pope2, Peter C Hansen2

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. L.RodriguesDeAlmeida@bham.ac.uk.

Cognitive Processing
|March 11, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Motor involvement in phonological processing changes with task demands. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects on the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) network depend on task load, impacting functional connectivity.

Keywords:
LIFGLanguagePhonological processingTask loadfMRItDCS

More Related Videos

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum
11:47

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum

Published on: February 15, 2015

29.9K
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course
11:33

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Published on: July 18, 2014

43.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS of Wernicke's and Broca's Areas in Studies of Language Learning and Word Acquisition
12:49

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS of Wernicke's and Broca's Areas in Studies of Language Learning and Word Acquisition

Published on: July 13, 2019

17.8K
Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum
11:47

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum

Published on: February 15, 2015

29.9K
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course
11:33

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Published on: July 18, 2014

43.8K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psycholinguistics

Background:

  • Motor system engagement in phonological processing varies with speech perception and production tasks.
  • The left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG), specifically the pars opercularis, shows increased activity correlating with motor demands across this spectrum.
  • Understanding how transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) interacts with task load and network structure is crucial for interpreting its effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how task load modulates tDCS effects on functional connectivity within the phonological processing network.
  • To examine the role of the LIFG and its network in phonological processing under varying task demands.
  • To test predictions derived from the multi-node framework regarding tDCS modulation by task load.

Main Methods:

  • Simultaneous transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) were employed.
  • Participants (N=20) performed three tasks: categorical perception, lexical decision, and word naming, each with varying task loads and differential recruitment of the LIFG.
  • tDCS was applied in anodal, cathodal, and sham conditions, with functional connectivity analyzed using partial correlations.

Main Results:

  • Simultaneous tDCS-fMRI successfully demonstrated that task nature modulates motor participation in phonological processing.
  • Cathodal tDCS (C-tDCS) induced network responses consistent with predictions, showing increased inhibition with higher task load.
  • Anodal tDCS (A-tDCS) effects were linked to the optimization of network efficiency, with greater impact at higher task loads.

Conclusions:

  • Task load significantly influences the impact of tDCS on the functional connectivity of the phonological processing network.
  • The findings support the multi-node framework, highlighting the interplay between task demands, network structure, and neuromodulation.
  • Motor engagement in phonological processing is adaptable and subject to modulation by both task context and targeted brain stimulation.