Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

25.3K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.3K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

338
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
338
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.1K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.1K
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

29.2K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
29.2K
Drug Regulation01:25

Drug Regulation

2.6K
Drug regulation encompasses the management of drug usage by evaluating its safety and efficacy through assessments conducted by regulatory authorities. Regrettably, the history of drug regulation is marred by several catastrophic events. One such incident is the Elixir Sulfanilamide tragedy, in which the toxic compound diethyl glycol was included in a sweet-tasting medication, leading to numerous fatalities. This event prompted the enactment of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in 1938. Under...
2.6K
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.8K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The emerging field of wild animal welfare science.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Everything and nothing is conscious: default assumptions in science and ethics.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Ethicists and the Gaza War.

Bioethics·2025
Same author

What will society think about AI consciousness? Lessons from the animal case.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2025
Same author

Evaluating animal consciousness.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

How Should Treatment of Animals Beyond the Lab Factor Into Institutional Review?

AMA journal of ethics·2024
Same journal

Sentience. Not Necessarily a Problem?

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

No Need to Feel.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

The One Health Paradigm and Wild Animal Welfare Science.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

From Mollusks to Machines: An Ethical Framework Focused on the Urgency of Extreme Suffering.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

Sentience and Why It Matters.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

The Wrong Motives for Potentially Harming a Being.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.1K

Can Knowledge Itself Justify Harmful Research?

Jeff Sebo, David Degrazia

    Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics : CQ : the International Journal of Healthcare Ethics Committees
    |March 12, 2020
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This paper discusses necessary conditions for ethical animal research, proposing three key criteria. A commentary suggests replacing the "sufficient net benefit" condition with "expectation of knowledge production," which the authors find promising but not fully convincing.

    More Related Videos

    The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
    09:12

    The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

    Published on: July 4, 2013

    72.3K
    A Knowledge Graph Approach to Elucidate the Role of Organellar Pathways in Disease via Biomedical Reports
    07:35

    A Knowledge Graph Approach to Elucidate the Role of Organellar Pathways in Disease via Biomedical Reports

    Published on: October 13, 2023

    2.0K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Dec 26, 2025

    Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
    05:47

    Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

    Published on: June 13, 2025

    1.1K
    The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
    09:12

    The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

    Published on: July 4, 2013

    72.3K
    A Knowledge Graph Approach to Elucidate the Role of Organellar Pathways in Disease via Biomedical Reports
    07:35

    A Knowledge Graph Approach to Elucidate the Role of Organellar Pathways in Disease via Biomedical Reports

    Published on: October 13, 2023

    2.0K

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Animal Research Ethics

    Background:

    • Ethical frameworks for animal research are crucial for scientific integrity and animal welfare.
    • Previous work established three necessary conditions for morally permissible animal research: sufficient net benefit, worthwhile life, and no unnecessary harm.
    • A recent commentary proposed an amendment to these conditions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate a proposed amendment to the ethical conditions for animal research.
    • To respond to a commentary suggesting a replacement for the "expectation of sufficient net benefit" condition.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical analysis of ethical principles in animal research.
    • Critical evaluation of the proposed "expectation of knowledge production" condition.

    Main Results:

    • The authors acknowledge the merit of the proposed "expectation of knowledge production" (EKP) condition.
    • The authors remain unconvinced that EKP should entirely replace the "expectation of sufficient net benefit" (ESNB) condition.

    Conclusions:

    • The discussion highlights the ongoing refinement of ethical standards in animal research.
    • Further dialogue is needed to determine the optimal conditions for balancing scientific advancement and animal welfare.