Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
Relationship between interference control and working memory with academic performance in high school students: The
Marie-Maude Dubuc1, Mylène Aubertin-Leheudre2, Antony D Karelis2
1Department of Biology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, H3C 3P8, Canada.
Cognitive control, including interference control and working memory, did not predict academic performance in high school students. Gender differences in grades were not explained by these cognitive measures.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive psychology
- Educational psychology
- Developmental neuroscience
Background:
- Academic performance is influenced by various cognitive factors.
- Understanding the interplay between cognitive control, working memory, and academic success is crucial for educational interventions.
- Gender disparities in academic achievement warrant investigation into underlying cognitive mechanisms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the longitudinal relationship between interference control and working memory and academic performance in high school students.
- To examine potential gender differences in cognitive control, working memory, and academic achievement.
- To determine if cognitive control and working memory predict academic performance over a three-year period.
Main Methods:
- A 3-year prospective study involving 187 French-Canadian students (grades 7-9).
- Assessment of interference control (Flanker task) and working memory (N-back task) annually.
- Measurement of academic performance including grades in science, mathematics, language, and overall average.
Main Results:
- Female students achieved significantly higher grades than male students in overall average, science, and language at years 1 and 3.
- No significant gender differences were observed in interference control or working memory measures.
- The relationship between cognitive control and academic performance varied by gender.
- Neither interference control nor working memory emerged as primary predictors of academic performance for either gender.
Conclusions:
- Cognitive control measures, specifically interference control and working memory, did not explain gender differences in academic performance.
- Interference control and working memory showed weak associations with academic performance.
- These cognitive measures demonstrated a limited ability to predict academic performance variations over the 3-year study period.
More Related Videos
07:01Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
Published on: September 20, 2020
09:05Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)
Published on: June 12, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Information Processing Approach
Working Memory
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory