Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

An Immunohistopathologic Study to Profile the Folate Receptor Beta Macrophage and Vascular Immune Microenvironment in Giant Cell Arteritis
Published on: February 8, 2019
Can rheumatologists diagnose and manage Giant Cell Arteritis better than non-rheumatologists? The Maltese Experience
Erika Cefai1, Marica Galea1, Rebecca Galea1
1Department of Rheumatology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
Insights
Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) has a low incidence in Malta. While rheumatologists better adhere to guidelines for GCA management, overall improvement is needed for optimal patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Epidemiology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) presents diagnostic and management challenges due to its varied presentation across medical specialties.
- Effective management and diagnosis are crucial for preventing complications associated with GCA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the incidence of biopsy-proven GCA in Malta.
- To compare the management strategies for GCA between rheumatologists and non-rheumatologists.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective observational population study analyzed data from patients undergoing temporal artery biopsy (TAB) between 2012 and 2015.
- Data included demographics, symptoms, TAB histology, treatment, and outcomes, benchmarked against British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) 2010 guidelines.
Main Results:
- The incidence of biopsy-proven GCA in Malta (over 50 population) was 3.82 per 100,000 patient-years.
- Rheumatologist involvement was associated with a higher likelihood of positive TAB results (30.5% vs. 14.1%) and more adherence to high-dose corticosteroid treatment and regular monitoring.
- Only 43.3% of confirmed GCA cases received rheumatology input.
Conclusions:
- Malta exhibits a low incidence of biopsy-proven GCA.
- While rheumatologists demonstrate better adherence to GCA management guidelines, there is a need for broader improvement in care standardization.
- Rheumatologists should lead efforts to minimize management variations and optimize GCA patient care.
Objectives:
Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) remains a challenge both in terms of diagnosis and management as patients may present to several different specialists. The objectives were to determine incidence of biopsy-proven GCA in Malta and to compare the management between rheumatologists and non-rheumatologists.
Methods:
This was a retrospective observational population study of patients with suspected GCA who underwent a temporal artery biopsy (TAB) between 2012 and 2015. Data collected consisted of demographics, presenting symptoms, TAB histology reports, treatment and outcome. The British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) 2010 guidelines were used as standard of care.
Results:
136 patients underwent a TAB for suspected GCA of which 26 were positive. The incidence of biopsy-proven GCA in Malta was 3.82 per 100,000 patient years in the over 50 population. There were 63 patients who were treated as GCA. Only 43.3% of confirmed cases had rheumatology input. TABs requested by rheumatologists were twice more likely to be positive compared to requests by non-rheumatologists (30.5% vs. 14.1%).The majority of patients were started on a Prednisolone dose between 40-60mg. Rheumatologists maintained patients on high doses for at least 1 month in 54% of cases as opposed to 20% under non-rheumatologists. Monitoring was more regular for cases followed up by rheumatologists (40% vs. 21%).
Conclusions:
Malta has a low incidence of biopsy proven GCA. Although rheumatologists are more likely to adhere to the recommended guidelines, improvement is needed. Rheumatologists should take the lead to minimise variation and optimise management of GCA.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Pericarditis III: Medical Management

